Answer:
the testing team
Explanation:
because even though she may have fulfilled the requirements but she still need to test if it runs perfectly or not
Answer:
I think the answer is D but please let me know if i am wrong
Explanation:
They cannot legally check it without a warrant.
Depending on the circumstances of the arrest/check, and the method of seizure of the mobile device, you are subject to a certain set of rights, laws, or protections. First off, know that it is your right to decline the warrantless search of your mobile phone. If you are arrested or taken into police custody, you should verbally state that you do not consent to a search of your devices. A law enforcement agency is only permitted to conduct a warrantless search of your device if a compelling case for an emergency can be made.
If the authorities are using evidence obtained through an unlawful search of your mobile device against you in a criminal proceeding, you can move for that data to be suppressed under the Fourth Amendment right to freedom from incidental seizures.
Complete question is attached as snapshot.
Answer:
This will result in a compilation error.
Here's the inheritance hierarchy:
Meg -> Lois -> Brian -> Stewie
Now Meg has 2 public Fxns, a() and toString().
Lois inherits from Meg and all its public functions as well but, overrides the a() fxn of its super class.
So finally Lois has fxns a(), b() and toString().
Brian extends Lois and inherits all the above listed fxns of Lois, but overrides the b() and toString() fxns.
Stewie extends Brian and inherits all the fxns of Brian, but overrides the a() and toString() fxns.
In the Main driver fxn, we call a() and b() methods of all these classes but, the base class Meg has no b() and it is not extending any class so its not available in its scope.
This results in a compilation error.
Explanation: