The correct answer is <span>a. It convinced Americans that the war wasn't nearly over.
American citizens were led to believe that the communists were losing the war and that everything would end soon. This offensive showed everyone how complex and difficult the situation was and in turn led to loss of support for the war effort by the public.</span>
Hey there!
<span>Benedict Arnold was a general during the American Revolutionary
War, who fought for the American Continental Army, and later defected to
the British Army. Althouh, he was not the </span><span>commander at Fort Ticonderoga.
I hope this helps!
Much love, Makayla </span>
It was Bolsheviks (I am not sure if I remember correctly but it should mean something like "majority" but I am not 100% sure).
There are different kinds of myth. The material that one will turn into if you are touched by the Greek king Midas is gold.
In the story, Silenus Midas was given a reward by Dionysus and that was to make a wish. The king did wished that all he did ever touched should turn to gold and it happened as he wanted. His food also became gold and this lead to starvation and later on he realized his error in his wish.
The most famous King Midas is known to be highly remembered in Greek mythology because of everything he touched were turn into gold. This came is therefore called the Midas touch.
Learn more about Gold from
brainly.com/question/25612026
Explanation:
Law does not function in vacuum. Law operates for and in the society; and it is influenced by the mores and attitudes of the society. Correspondingly, law is an instrument of social change. The law thus never can be static; it has to change constantly with the changes in the society. Judiciary plays a major role for this change since judges interpret and redefine the laws through their judicial decisions. The demands of the time and society become prominent factors for judge in the law interpretation process. Their judicial opinions consequently become precedents - 'settled' or 'established' law that can provide legal foundation for settling subsequent cases. Hence, those who are associated in the field of law have to read case judgments for their research or academic purposes.
Mere knowledge of legal rules is not enough to do research in law. It also needs the analytical skills to extract ratio, observation and to apply these principles in different factual situations. This paper endeavors to identify certain parameters, which by no means are exhaustive but are only enabling points which could help a researcher to read and understand the judicial opinion. To achieve the very purposes of reading, the yardstick is not mere the ability to read, but to comprehend very essence of what is written.
The author believes that when a judgment is written well with clarity and consistency, even a common man would be able to figure out the contours of law. Since the objective of any judgment or judicial opinion is justice, the judge's conveying skill and the reader's skill ought to converge upon a common end.
