Serious but not dark. show that you are trying hard to get your point across but not to hard. also, dont be so serious that you creep them out
Answer: WHERE IS THE ARTICLE
How am i going to answer the question if you dont give us the article.
Explanation:
<span>Women are the main breadwinners in two-thirds of families across the country. - Valid reasoning. This does support the argument by showing the damage the unequal pay does not only to those women, but also to their families.
</span><span>Employers pay different workers different salaries based on skill level. - Invalid reasoning. Women don't demand to be paid more than the men who happen to have better skills, but simply to be paid equally when they have equal skills.
</span><span>Paying people different salaries for the same work is discrimination. - Valid reasoning. That is the basic argument, leveled up. It would be the same as paying all blue-haired men more than the brown or black-haired, when they are doing the same work, with the same skills.
</span><span>Women's incomes are needed for the survival of their families. - Valid reasoning. Just like in the first case, this one shows that this issue doesn't only concern women, but their families - finally, their husbands, the very ones who are paid better for equal work.
</span><span><span>Women are ready to fight back against pay discrimination. - Invalid reasoning. This doesn't have anything to do with the issue itself. It is just a reaction to it, but it doesn't support it.</span>
</span>
Answer:
B. The hikers noticed the bears.
Explanation:
so the meaning of the original passive sentence is that the BEARS were noticed by the HIKERS, not the other way around. choice B is correct because the HIKERS are still noticing the BEARS. it can't be A or D because the bears aren't supposed to be noticing the hikers, and C is just like the original sentence but written with "near" instead of "by"
D
Explanation:
b/c it makes sense and I guess it also sounds better
