In "Adrift in a Moral Sea," Garrett argues that a wealthy country is similar to a lifeboat that holds 50 people with capacity to hold 10 more, but is faced with 100 additional people who need to be saved. His argument is that the lifeboat will sink if the boat exceeds capacity, and that even maximum capacity is too much of a risk.
While I believe it is possible for a country to "sink" if too much help is given, there are other means to help other than "letting people onto the lifeboat." While it is a good example, it is oversimplified. This argument is against giving handouts, or doing anything that would put a current wealthy country at risk, but it doesn't provide another alternative other than ignore the crisis.
Take a photo for the entire number line bc is between 7 and 6
MEN AND WOMEN ARE THE SAME BECAUSE THEY ALL HAVE THE SAME RIGHTS AND WHAT 1 SEX CAN DO THE OTHER CAN 2....
Surely it was a good way to die, in the place of someone else, someone I loved.
Explanation:
I would rather have a courageous death they die with no meaning
<span>She's now having to endure the questioning of her classmates, and she's fine with that. It's an acceptance of self</span>