by praising the efficiency of modern-day Internet research doesn't relate to anything regarding "Choreographers of Matter, Life, and Intelligence" when it comes to argumentation. Comparing scientific knowledge to grains of sand on a beach is poetic, but it is no argument either. Proving names of modern scientists and their contributions also shows nothing but the scientists and their contributions themselves. It doesn't work as proof for <em>"an impending scientific revolution".</em>
What Michio Kaku does, as the good scientist that he is, is to show evidence. And he does so "by providing quantitative proof of recent scientific progress"
Answer:
He was planning to have one himself, so he began with a polite offer to the blind man.
Explanation:
The husband and his wife occasionally smoke marijuana as a way to relax at night. Now that the blind man was visiting them, he didn't want to change his habits and he felt like smoking a cigarette at the time. As he wanted one, he also offered it to the blind man - that's all there's to it as there were no bad intentions.
A noun is a person, place, or thing. The nouns in this sentence are the people, the places, and the things, meaning the answer is D. Boy and girl are people, school is a place, and hands are things.
Answer: Union Home Minister Shri Amit Shah
Explanation:
hope this helps
Answer: he describes how Stanley feels when he looks out the bus window
Explanation: because it says reveals details about the character as he looks out the bus windows so in terms of saying how does he feel what are his thoughts it does not say what is he sees and how he behaves it's just how he's feeling about the whole situation in the thoughts help with that as well
