Answer:
The answer is C
Explanation:
What came to be known as the Seven Years' War (1756-1763) began as a conflict between Great Britain and France in 1754, when the British sought to expand into territory claimed by the French in North America.
The correct answer would be option A, Dr. Banks, our family doctor, was born in Colorado.
The above mentioned statement contains a correctly punctuated appositive phrase.
Explanation:
An appositive phrase is a phrase that contains a noun or pronoun, with some additional information about it. The information given in the appositive phrase is usually separated by commas to show the true meaning of that phrase.
For example, in the given statement, Dr. Banks is a noun, after which comma is placed to give a pause and states about who Dr. Banks is. After comma, it is told that Dr. Banks is our family doctor, after which another comma is placed to show the ending of information about the noun(Dr. Banks). After the comma, the sentence is completed by giving information that Dr. Banks, our family doctor, was born in Colorado.
This is the accurate punctuation of an appositive phrase.
Learn more about Punctuation of appositive phrase at:
brainly.com/question/2422041
#LearnWithBrainly
Answer:
I am not so sure. I need help with the question as well.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
