3)False 4)voting 5)True 6)True 7)consumers 8)True 9)True 10)True 11)propaganda 12)False 13)the Stamp Act 14)False 15)True
The difference is quite simple, a child under the care of his parents is not a slave, or at least he is not supposed to be. A slave is a human being forced into involuntary and total servitude for the entirety of his life. A child is only under the authority of his parents until he turns 18. As of 18 years of age he/she is considered an adult and can do as he/she pleases with his own life. It needs to be remarked that authority is not the same as forced involuntary servitude (though some kids might be inclined to use such term when asked to collaborate with reasonable house chores but that is just plain hyperbolic immaturity). The emancipation of an actual slave by a slave owner is seldom voluntary and most times it is forced (it took a Civil War to settle the question). The emancipation of a kid takes place for very different reasons:
- The parents are found to neglect the well-being of the child (exploitation, sexual abuse, violent physical or psychological abuse, etc). The child is then emancipated, that is to say removed from his parent’s care and either becomes a ward of the State or the adopted son or daughter of another family).
- The child has left school at age 16 and starts working and earning his/her own salary and achieves financial independence from his /her parents. He/she marries or enters the army.
It is evident that the only similarity between the emancipation of a child and the emancipation of a slave is the use of the same word that has the same etymological source but very different meanings.
Between the times of actual slavery and now. Things have changed quite a bit. There was no legal framework for the emancipation of children, let alone laws preventing their neglect by parents. Emancipation of slaves occurred a long time before the emancipation of children was established in the 20th century. It did take place de facto before that but there was no legal framework.
Answer:
i did a little reaserch into this and i find b as the most plausable awnser i might be wrong tho so tell me if i am
Explanation:
A dispute between two countries about tariffs would most likely be settled by the World Trade Organization.
<h3>What is the world trade organization?</h3>
This is the body that overseas the trades that occurs internationally between the different nations of the world.
The World Trade organization is concerned with dealing with the rules of trade between nations.
Read more on world trade organization here:
brainly.com/question/10593734
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not attach the text or the excerpt. You forgot to include this important information. Without it, we do not know what the text says.
However, trying to offer some help, we can comment on the following.
In Hitler's Germany, it was the group. the people that were very important to strengthen the nation after so many difficult years during the Weimar republic.
Nay leader Adolph Hitler became the leader of Germany in 1933 and immediately used propaganda to spread their antisemitism, nationalistic, and supremacists ideas to the Germans. Behind this successful propaganda was the brilliant mind of Joseph Goebbels, the man who developed deep and powerful concepts to make people "blindly" follow Hitler's ideas.
