Answer:
c
Explanation:
im not positive I could be wrong
The Treaties of Utrecht, signed in Utrecht in the Dutch Republic, were negotiated after the War of the Spanish Succession. In the agreements signed with Great Britain, France agreed to the following:
1. France acknowledged Queen Anne<span> as the rightful British monarch.
</span>2. France would stop its support of James Edward<span>, the son of the former king </span>James II of England, who had been removed from the throne during the Glorious Revolution of 1688.
<span>3. France conceded the Great Britain the Hudson Bay territory, Newfoundland, </span>Nova Scotia<span>, </span><span>and the island of St. Kitts.
4. France would demolish its fortifications at Dunkirk. (They had attacked British shipping from there.)</span>
<span>the right answer is B. powerful central government (i just took the test and these are the test answers.)</span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
A specific situation where the principle of checks and balances could be used for the good of the people would be the following.
When the President of the United States sends a bill to the US Congress, thinking that would benefit the economy of the country. For instance, a new tax. When the bill gets to Congress, the House of Representatives decides that this bill is no good for the American people and that is biased to benefit just a political group or the President's Party. Then Congress did not pass the new bill proposed by the executive branch.
Or it could be the other way around. That the President receives a law from the legislative branch and the President considers it is biased to benefit a political group. Then the President exerts his power to veto the law.
The system of checks and balances has been one of the best things implemented by the framers of the Constitution. It guarantees that none of the three branches of the federal government has more power over the other two.
Answer:
This is a traditional opinion expressed by <u>an Anti-Federalist</u>
Explanation:
Look at this excerpt, and analyse some of it's passages:
<u>"I beg you to call to mind our glorious Declaration of Independence, read it, and compare it with the Federal Constitution; what a degree of apostasy will you not then discover."</u>
<u>"Therefore, guard against all encroachments upon your liberties so dearly purchased with the costly expense of blood and treasure."</u>
<u />
<u>These two statements expressed an Anti-Federalist opinion, because it's against the formation of a strong government, and most significantly, the creation of a Federal Constitution. </u>This movement was afraid that the Constitution would create a presidential regime so powerfull that would lead to a monarchy. <u>They advocate that the Constitution should promote limits to power, and this group always used the Declaration of Independence as an argument.</u>