Answer:
To understand why French Canadians have struggled to settle in the west, historians have focused primarily on cultural differences. New research reveals that English and French speakers have somewhat different personal characteristics. Large-scale migration into New England balanced the demographic and human capital profile of French Canadians. Although if by the 1880s the U.S. had introduced immigration controls, many French Canadians would not possibly have been redirected westward, writers claim. There was little chance of later chain migration of French Canadians to the West, they add, without much of the base built by the beginning of the twentieth century. The only mainly French-speaking province in 1867 was Quebec, although it was one out of four provinces. Just about 5% of western Canada's white population spoke French as their mother tongue in 1901. Political structures in the new provinces of Alberta and Saskatchewan were most unlikely to be built with Francophones in mind without a significant minority of Francophone voters in the early 1900s. Chain migration is sometimes provided as a dominant explanation, but every chain has a beginning, for the locational concentrations of migrants of one ethnicity or regional history.
I am fairly sure it is D. I remember learning the chant "The US wanted to demilitarize and democratize Japan".
US is more rude to Native Americans. While US is more kind to in foreign affairs because they want to get stuff out of the trade.
Answer:
The Tang Dynasty, which ruled China from 618 to 907 CE, conquered Vietnam, and made it the southernmost province of China.
Vietnam, up until that point, had been a problematic place for China, even it it was much smaller. The Tang Dynasty was able to conquer the area, and integrate into the central bureacuracy of the Empire, this is why they began to referred to Vietnam as the "pacified south".
D because they were now aware of challenges that may arise like disease when invading
