Answer:
Explanation:
In critical conditions since when a forest is cut down if it rains the land is not in a condition for trees to flourish since every time it rains you will see a flood devastating any plant that tries to grow.
Answer:
The correct answer is option C "There could be damage done to the firearm, and serious injury to the shooter".
Explanation:
There could be serious consequences of using the wrong ammunition when a firearm is being loaded. There could be damage done to the firearm, because the cartridge of the firearm could become lodged and could even explode. However, the most serious situation is the injury that the shooter could receive as result of the explosion. The data stamp of the ammunition must be checked to avoid this situation.
It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.
There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.
There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:
- no mutation
- random mating
- no gene flow
- infinite population size
- and no selection (natural nor forced).
You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.
For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.
Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.
If you want to learn more, you can read:
brainly.com/question/19431143
