One drawback to direct democracy is that there would still be corruption. Corruption would still exists.
Answer:
Each of the thirteen colonies had a charter, or written agreement between the colony and the king of England or Parliament. Charters of royal colonies provided for direct rule by the king. A colonial legislature was elected by property holding males.
Explanation:
Each colony had a governor who served as head of the government. In some colonies the people also elected representatives to help make laws and set policy.
A coke sorry i don’t really know bc you didn’t put any options
A) the enlightenment
Why: because these ideas reflect the enlightenment a time of when the ideas of free press, rule by the people of the people for the people, separation of powers, etc. were emerging through Europe.
Also Social Darwinism is basically racism
Feudalism is filed by a lord who owns your land.
Communism is where everyone is supposed to be equal but then the people who worked for their stuff gets it taken away in the name of equality so no one has a motivation to improve and everyone ends up starving to death like in Russia and Ukraine and China where hundreds of millions of people literally died from starving. Look up the Ukraine famine where millions of people starved to death in a span of like 2 years. Communism is bad.
B)They had to pay a special tax.
the tax was called "Jizya"
