Answer:
3. No, due to unilateral mistake
Explanation:
Lacey and Cagney both had agreed to wok for 30 hours per week and the agreement is in written format since it is enforceable. Both of them are sharing 50% profits so both will have to share the duties equally. When Lacey makes an excuse and is working for 20 hours per week only Cagney can sues her and she is in a probability to win against her. Lacey should have informed Cagney about the vacation from school scenario before signing the contract.
<span>This is an example of a cost of international trade. This can make it so that some domestic businesses lose their market share to foreign companies. This can create less profits for the company and made it so that it is difficult to create jobs.</span>
Answer:
True
Explanation:
In contract law and civil law, the duty to mitigate damages refers to the duty that the individual responsible for the wrongdoing must carry out to limit the harm or injury caused by him/her. The duty to mitigate applies both for contract breaches and victims or torts.
Capital is a way of having land and labor to be involved for
production. In the given scenario above, the catapult and rock would be a
capital since it is needed to be made by people in order to gain something or
it is used for production.
Answer: Option (E)
Explanation:
Assurance engagement tends to refer or mean that an engagement, under which an individual or practitioner tends to express a conclusion, that is designed in order to enhance the level or degree of confidence of user or the intended user, apart from the responsible individual about the result or outcome of measurement or evaluation of the subject matter against the stated criteria.