Answer:
War for any purpose is unnecessary and inhumane
Explanation:
The stance of the United Nations towards wars is clear, that it should be avoided by means, and that it is unnecessary and inhumane. This conclusion by the United States has been based on the two world wars that brought so much destruction in the world, with millions of people getting killed, displaced, lost their families and homes. In order for such things to never happen again, the United States have set an agenda for preventing any war between any member nations, and while this has been partial success, it has also been a partial unsuccessful, as there has been lot of wars pretty much every year around the world.
Throughout the European colonization of North America by the French and British, tenions between French and British settlers in North America (traders, poachers and the like) built up a deep resentment against each other since they often competed for the same land, same "markets" to trade their goods with the Native Americans, etc. However, the animosity between the two parties goes back a long time, even before the colonization of America, to the times of the One Hundred Years' War, and perhaps, even log before.
If I was an explorer more than likely I didn't even realized I discovered anything new.
Answer:
to oppose it wherever it exsisted
<span>Federal Emergency Relief Administration (FERA);Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC);Reconstruction Finance Corporation (RFC);Agricultural Adjustment Administration (AAA);National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA);Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC); and<span>Public Works Administration (PWA).</span></span>
