1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rom4ik [11]
3 years ago
6

Read an excerpt from "Television and the Public Interest" and answer the question. The speech was delivered by Newton N. Minow,

chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, to the nation’s television executives in 1961.
[1] … But when television is bad, nothing is worse. I invite each of you to sit down in front of your television set when your station goes on the air and stay there, for a day, without a book, without a magazine, without a newspaper, without a profit and loss sheet or a rating book to distract you. Keep your eyes glued to that set until the station signs off. I can assure you that what you will observe is a vast wasteland.

[2] You will see a procession of game shows, formula comedies about totally unbelievable families, blood and thunder, mayhem, violence, sadism, murder, western bad men, western good men, private eyes, gangsters, more violence, and cartoons. And endlessly, commercials—many screaming, cajoling, and offending. And most of all, boredom. True, you'll see a few things you will enjoy. But they will be very, very few. And if you think I exaggerate, I only ask you to try it.

[3] Is there one person in this room who claims that broadcasting can't do better? Well a glance at next season's proposed programming can give us little heart. Of 73 and 1/2 hours of prime evening time, the networks have tentatively scheduled 59 hours of categories of action-adventure, situation comedy, variety, quiz, and movies. Is there one network president in this room who claims he can't do better?

[4] The best estimates indicate that during the hours of 5 to 6 P.M. sixty percent of your audience is composed of children under twelve. And most young children today, believe it or not, spend as much time watching television as they do in the schoolroom. I repeat—let that sink in, ladies and gentlemen—most young children today spend as much time watching television as they do in the schoolroom. It used to be said that there were three great influences on a child: home, school, and church. Today, there is a fourth great influence, and you ladies and gentlemen in this room control it.

[5] If parents, teachers, and ministers conducted their responsibilities by following the ratings, children would have a steady diet of ice cream, school holidays, and no Sunday school. What about your responsibilities? Is there no room on television to teach, to inform, to uplift, to stretch, to enlarge the capacities of our children? Is there no room for programs deepening their understanding of children in other lands? There are some fine children's shows, but they are drowned out in the massive doses of cartoons, violence, and more violence. Must these be your trademarks? Search your consciences and see if you cannot offer more to your young beneficiaries whose future you guide so many hours each and every day …

[6] You must provide a wider range of choices, more diversity, more alternatives. It is not enough to cater to the nation's whims; you must also serve the nation's needs. And I would add this: that if some of you persist in a relentless search for the highest rating and the lowest common denominator, you may very well lose your audience. Because … the people are wise, wiser than some of the broadcasters—and politicians—think.

Select the two sentences that support the argument that television has the potential to have a profound influence on children.
"Of 73 and 1/2 hours of prime evening time, the networks have tentatively scheduled 59 hours of categories of action-adventure, situation comedy, variety, quiz, and movies." (paragraph 3)
"And most young children today, believe it or not, spend as much time watching television as they do in the schoolroom." (paragraph 4)
"If parents, teachers, and ministers conducted their responsibilities by following the ratings, children would have a steady diet of ice cream, school holidays, and no Sunday school." (paragraph 5)
"Is there no room on television to teach, to inform, to uplift, to stretch, to enlarge the capacities of our children?" (paragraph 5)
"There are some fine children's shows, but they are drowned out in the massive doses of cartoons, violence, and more violence." (paragraph 5)
English
1 answer:
nignag [31]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

"And most young children today, believe it or not, spend as much time watching television as they do in the schoolroom."

"If parents, teachers, and ministers conducted their responsibilities by following the ratings, children would have a steady diet of ice cream, school holidays, and no Sunday school."

Explanation:

These two sentences support the argument that television has the potential to have a profound influence on children.

You might be interested in
All three level of professionals are required to run and organizations or a smoothly justify it​
seropon [69]

Answer:

Most organizations have three management levels: first-level, middle-level, and top-level managers. These managers are classified according to a hierarchy of authority and perform different tasks. In many organizations, the number of managers in each level gives the organization a pyramid structure.

7 0
3 years ago
What type of word relationship does this analogy show?
Studentka2010 [4]
I believe the answer is C
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do the Finnish and Filipino examples about dating suggest<br> about smartphones?
Butoxors [25]
I can take you out for lunch today or do you want me in a few hours to pick you out and then you will be there for me please help you pick me out please please help me out with my new job please help you out with the new job I am not going out with the help you need help with this please
7 0
3 years ago
Why does the evidence provided in the excerpt make the author's argument more effective? It is vague. It is specific. It is comp
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

Answer: It is specific.

Explanation:

The evidence provided in the excerpt make the author's argument more effective because it is specific.

The author was specific about the importance of switching to renewable energy. He outlined that it can lead to job creation and he was specific and gave examples about how it can create many jobs in the United States.

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Anaphora is an example of?
alukav5142 [94]
Logical fallacy
There ya go
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The glass breaking in the WTC is compared to an ice storm, which is a Question 5 options: simile metaphor personification hyperb
    7·1 answer
  • What is the indirect object in this sentence? "the coach offered frank some good advice
    11·1 answer
  • Which genre of writing was invented during the post modernist movement?. . A. War literature. B. satirical essay. C. symbolic po
    9·2 answers
  • 18)
    14·1 answer
  • What was the result of Dante choosing to write the Divine Comedy in Italian rather than Latin?
    12·1 answer
  • The counterclaim of an argument should be
    5·2 answers
  • The sentence "she don't want to go "is
    7·1 answer
  • Should states require adolescents to be eighteen before obtaining a driver’s license Bipin
    8·1 answer
  • What does it mean when asked what is the source that you are going to research
    6·1 answer
  • Who is my profile pic?​
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!