Answer:
Misrepresentation & Fraud:
a) Elements for Fraudulent Misrepresentation:
1) A representation was in fact made: This means that it was not just a mere opinion expressed by the party misrepresenting.
2) That particular representation was false: The statement made was untrue.
3) The defendant had knowledge that the representation was false: The misrepresentation was intentional on the party of the defendant.
4) The statement was made with the intention that the other party rely on it and enter into a contract or agreement: The defendant was out to induce the other party to enter the contract.
b) Kahn committed a fraud since he intentionally induced Lischner to contract on the basis of fraudulent misrepresentation. The remedy available for Lischner is to rescind the contract.
Explanation:
a) Fraudulent misrepresentation is the presentation of false facts by someone who attempts to persuade another into action with the intent to deceive. The remedy available to the deceived party is to rescind the contract or to plea for damages.
b) According to the britannica.com, "Fraud, in law, is the deliberate misrepresentation of fact for the purpose of depriving someone of a valuable possession."
Another term that can be used for Defensive strategy is retrenchment strategy.
- Defensive strategy can be regarded as marketing tool which is been used by companies in retaining valuable customers that can be easily loose to their competitors.
- Competitors can be regarded as other firms that are present in the same market selling almost similar products
- This strategy is been utilized by companies in market leadership positions in defending market share from attacks by challengers;
- Some if the defence strategies are;
<em>counter-offensive defence</em>
<em>contraction defence</em>
<em> position defence</em>
<em>mobile defence</em>
<em>flanking defence</em>
<em> pre-emptive defence</em>
Therefore, defensive strategy can be explained as marketing tool that is been utilized by management in defending their business from potential competitors.
Learn more at: brainly.com/question/9063582?referrer=searchResults
Answer:
c. $1,000,000
Explanation:
The computation of the economic value added is shown below:
Economic value added = Operating income - total invested capital × WACC
= $3,000,000 - $20,000,000 × 10%
= $3,000,000 - $2,000,000
= $1,000,000
We simply deduct the total invested capital by multiplying the cost of capital from the operating income
Answer:
It is cheaper to make the part.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
The cost of producing 40,000 parts is $138,000, which includes fixed costs of $68,000 and variable costs of $70,000. The company can buy the part from an outside supplier for $3.50 per unit and avoid 30% of the fixed costs.
<u>The cost of making the part is $138,000. That will be the cost in the income statement. </u>
We can calculate the effect on income if they buy the part.
Buy:
Selling pirce= 3.5
Savings in fixed costs= (0.3*70,000)= 21,000
Total cost= 3.5*40,000 + 70,000 - 21,000= $189,000
It is cheaper to make the part.
Answer:
If Division X refuses to accept the $19 price internally and Division Y continues to buy from the outside supplier, the company as a whole will be:_________.
c. worse off by $28,600 each period.
Explanation:
The $28,600 loss the company incurs is from the lost contribution that Division Y's purchase of Division X's parts could have brought to the company if it buys parts inhouse. This is calculated as follows:
Division X's variable cost per unit = $17
Division X's selling price to outside customers = $23
Division Y's offered buying price = $19
The contribution = $2 ($19 - $17)
