Answer:
They include;
Anger, Fear, sadness, shame, Lack of sleep, anxiety, dependence on drugs, etc.
Explanation:
A disaster is a natural event that happens unexpectedly to cause great ruin and loss. A pandemic is an example of a disaster as it involves the sudden spread of a disease which results in sickness and mass death. The recent pandemic is an example. When things like this happen, common feelings and reactions to them include;
1. Sadness because we or our loved ones are passing through pain. Some of those known to us might have also died from the disaster.
2. Anger at the people whose actions resulted in the disaster.
3. Fear of we getting affected by the disaster or a reoccurrence of the disaster.
4. Shame: Because we lost possessions, jobs, or were infected by the disease in cases of pandemics.
5. Anxiety because we are unsure of the future.
6. Dependence on drugs to help us cope with the disaster and temporarily relieve ill feelings.
7. Lack of sleep because we become restless and are filled with anxious thoughts.
Society is what best summarizes the role of conversation.
Dear Editor.
My name is Tanvi and I decided to write this letter to report a serious situation that is happening in our community and I believe that in many others scattered in New Delhi. This situation is the constant attack on the elderly.
As we know, the elderly deserve respect and peace, since they work and worked hard to create the country in which we live. Many elderly people live alone for several reasons, mainly due to family abandonment, which is already a stressful situation for them who need to rest and have a peaceful life. The elderly, in general, are fragile and living alone leaves them extremely vulnerable, which allows evildoers to attack them.
Most of these malefactors want to steal something of value from the elderly, placing them in a situation of extreme stress and even acting with physical violence against them.
These attacks happen frequently in our region. For this reason, I would like to ask you to inform your audience about this problem, making them aware and allowing them to draw the attention of the authorities in relation to this.
I know that you will be helping the elderly in our community in the best possible way and I thank you for your time.
Sincerely.
J. Tanvi
The answer is "The inference is that investing in domestic development, like bridges and boulevards, is a privilege and not a right; it is logical because many other nations at this time were forced to spend their money to combat foreign attack."
Answer:
Nick Caraway meets the man with the enormous owl-eyed spectacles in Jay Gatsby's library, during one of Jay's parties. Nick and Jordan had politely left their company to find Jay. The man was drunk and wanted to know what Nick and Jordan thought of Jay's enormous collection of books.
The man seemed overwhelmed by the idea that Jay actually had real books in his library and not just mere cardboard replicas to create the impression of reality. His comment that Jay is a "regular Belasco" is a reference to a famous and popular playwright, impresario, director and producer at the time, David Belasco.
The reference to one rooted in theatre implies firstly, that the library has the makings of a theatre - it is impressively large and well-stocked. Secondly, it suggests that Gatsby is putting on a show. This is the reason why the man with the spectacles is so surprised that the books are actually genuine. He expected them to be fake. Just as the room presented something theatrical, so should the books have too.
It is ironic that the man should make this comment because he accurately identifies the theatricality and artificiality of Jay's life without realizing it. The Jay who presents himself to his audience is not the real James Gatz. He has adopted a fake identity and affectations such as "old sport", to impress and convey an image of wealth and academic success.
Furthermore, the reference to the owl-eyed nature of the man's spectacles alludes to knowledge, deep scrutiny and investigation. The irony is however, that the man makes the remark whilst drunk, so even his insight is doubtful since this is the type of logic or rationalization one can expect from an inebriate. His remarks are the ramblings of a drunk and are of no consequence or import.
