<h3>C
reating a method of capital punishment that would actually deter people from committing murder.</h3>
Explanation:
Numerous studies have shown that imposing capital punishment or harsh punishments does not actually deter people from committing crimes. Studies have shown that states imposing such punishments still have high criminal rate than those states that do not.
Televising executions would only create a lobby for more controversies and futile discussions on the morality of capital punishment. Human rights activists strongly disagree of commercializing such events on grounds of human moral rights. They also believe that a state does not have the right to execute an individual.
It is believed that capital punishments are imposed very rarely and only to those individuals who have committed heinous crimes. However, if we look into past incidences, the verdict has been used unfairly and partially. The power to impose such verdict also raises the question on the sovereign authority of a state by many critics. Critics argue that states should not have to right to determine the lives of the people.
Saudi Arabia, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait
<span>State level courts must comply with pronouncements from the U.S. Supreme Court over the meaning of the federal Constitution.
The constitution, firstly comprising seven articles, delineates the countrywide frame of government. its first 3 articles entrench the doctrine of the separation of powers, wherein the federal government is split into 3 branches: the legislative, inclusive of the bicameral congress; the government, such as the president; and the judicial, which includes the supreme court and different federal courts.
</span>
They weren't agreeing with things that were said
Answer:
A Butler County judge in Ohio ruled in February that traffic cameras that give tickets violate the Ohio and United States constitutional rights of drivers because they eliminate the possibility of due process, a requirement of the Fifth Amendment.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
