1. <span>A.Her learning style and the instructor’s teaching style conflict.
It seems like Keisha is more suited to learning information when it is presented in a direct and clear manner- for instance names of key figures and dates. However, her instructor seems to teach in a manner that is more abstract, indirect and implicit, leaving students to learn through inference and use analytical skills to compare and contrast different philosophical theories. This is why Keisha, who learns in a direct manner, struggles to learn and evaluate abstract theories in her instructor's classes.
2. </span><span>B. Visit the instructor during office hours and explain her difficulties. Work together to find a way to maximize Keisha’s learning despite the differences in their teaching and learning styles.
This is the best option since it gives the instructor an opportunity to understand Keisha's difficulties, and suggest options she can incorporate to learn the material more effectively. Options A,C and D are not suitable since they involve avoiding Keisha's problem. On the other hand, option B involves bringing the matter in the open and discussing suggestions that can improve Keisha's learning for this Philosophy course, and future abstract, theory-centered courses she might take.
3. </span><span>B. Stay up all night cramming the night before.
</span>
Staying up all night cramming for exams is an ineffective strategy since it deprives students from rest and sleep, which are crucial before an exam. Furthermore, cramming and leaving exam studies for last minute does not aid learning, since students do not have time to thoroughly understand concepts and apply their understanding of them during exams.
Maupassant also uses irony, which is when what you expect to happen is the opposite of what actually happens, and this is the driving force behind the surprise ending. It's ironic that the necklace is fake because Mathilde and her husband went into such debt to replace it.
Answer:
how can we explain this can u plz change language
Answer:
claim
Explanation:
A main claim is a position that the author makes in relation to an argument previously presented, but not only that, since this position governs all the ideas and arguments that the author will give throughout the text.
The text shown above shows a position, that is, an opinion of an author about something that is being done in the educational field and that is not being beneficial to anyone. As we saw before, a main claim is a position, so we can say that main claim is the answer to your question.
