A pep talk that can be given to a group of firefighters or a scout troop who have experienced a failure goes thus:
- Failure is a path to success. Every successful person has failed. Failure is part of everyone's life and the main thing is how you react to it.
- Do not let failure weigh you down. It is how you react that matters. Do not be afraid to try again. Failures are mistakes and you should try to be better and wiser the next time.
- It is time to rebound from your mistakes and achieve your goals. Believe in yourselves, you can do it. Do not let failure stop you.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/24839024
Answer:
The first uses dialogue and character; the second uses first-person point of view.
Explanation:
The first excerpt is found in Chapter Eight titled "September 2nd, 1973" from <em>Fever 1793</em> by Laurie Halse Anderson is based on the yellow fever epidemic that ravaged Philadelphia. The story is from the point of view of the young Mattie Cook, describing how the pandemic had destroyed the lives of the people.
The second excerpt is from <em>The Summer of the Pestilence</em> by George Dodd Armstrong. The book also deals with the history of the same yellow fever that not only affected Philadelphia but also other parts of the nation such as Virginia.
While both books deal with the same pandemic, their dealing with the issue of unprecedented deaths differ a bit. The first book uses a dialogue-conversation approach, with the characters greatly involved whereas the second book uses the first person point of view to address the deaths. These two books may deal with the same issue but their approaches of the deaths and sick people differ such that their narrative plots also differ.
The question asks us to choose the correct answer. We have to calculate how far did Daniel travel on the highway. The first mile marker ( when he gets onto the highway ) shows 141 and the second ( when he exits the highway ) 67 miles. We have to subtract 67 from 141: 141 - 67 = 74 miles. Answer: C ) 74 miles<span>.</span>
Answer: No. It isn't an example of ethos.
Explanation:
Ethos refers to an argument that's based on the credibility of the person that's making the argument.
Ethos simply means establishing the authority to speak on a particular object subject. It's the persuasion and the argument whereby the knowledge, good moral character and the credibility of the speaker is shown.
In this case, the example given isn't an example of ethos because dentists in this case is a broad term and therefore does not give credibility from a particular dentist or probably a dental research.
The answer is D i believe
