The statement from the dissenting opinion of tinker v. des moines court decision that best supports the reasoning that the conduct of the student protesters was not within the protection of the free speech clause of the first amendment is :
In cox v. Louisiana, the court clearly stated that the rights of free speech and assembly "do not mean that everyone with opinion or beliefs to express may address a group at any public place at any time
hope this helps
Architecture of mean like I don’t know
<span>A. Eumaeus and Melantho</span>
The correct options are:
1st: <em>They use a </em><em>primary source </em><em>to show that some white people opposed the idea of freeing enslaved people.</em> This primary source could have been written in diaries or memories by the same participants or people from those times.
2nd:<em> They use a </em><em>secondary source</em><em> to show that the British secretary of war opposed involuntary servitude.</em>This secondary source could have been found as a historical document in a library.
The authors use historical evidence such as primary and secondary sources to support their claim. While primary sources are produced by the participants or observers when the event took place (e.g. diaries, journals, memoirs, autobiographies), the secondary sources are produced when the historians use the information brought by the primary sources in order to write about a specific topic (e.g. a history book).
Look up a robert frost poem those will help
