Why did world leaders follow a different plan for reconstruction following WWII than the one used following WWI?

1 answer:

4 0

Yes, they did.

The WWI was concluded by a treaty that demanded big reparations from the countries that lost the war, which later burdened them financially and contributed to another war.

The WWII was concluded with attempts to unite the countries more and strengthen them economically, to avoid further conflicts.

They decided on this change because the terms of the Treaty of Versailles is blamed for bringing about another war, rather than peace.

You might be interested in

Anong kahulugan ng "tumatanggap ng puna"? <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=esp%20%5C%3A%20suject" id="TexFormula1" title="es

Anvisha [2.4K]

Answer:

accepting some feedback from others

Explanation:

Tagalog ng nga Hindi mo pa Alam

7 0

3 years ago

Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, two _________ Post reporters, reported on the Watergate break-in with the help of an unknown in

kobusy [5.1K]

This can easily be answered by looking up their names or "the Watergate scandal" on Google. If you didn't have access to Google, however, you should know that the Watergate scandal involved former President Nixon spying on his political opponents at the Watergate hotel. Although this is not infallible logic, if you had to make an 'educated guess', Nixon was the president at the time. The president lives in Washington D.C, the US capital. This should lead you to believe that the Washington Post might have uncovered this scandal. Indeed those two reporters worked for the Washington Post.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which level of government had more power under the Articles of Confederation?

alexandr1967 [171]

Answer:

State governments.

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Why did the United States break its policy of isolationism in reference to Cuba

Marrrta [24]

The United States break its policy of isolationism in reference to Cuba because
C)The United States had monetary interests in Cuba and wanted to protect them

Explanation:

Cuba was a good producer of things like Sugar that was a lot of required within us and in Europe moreover and also theU.S.A. individuals were middlemen in these trades. With Spanish ruling Cuba, they could not pursue these economic interests in order that they needed Cuba to become freelance therefore it may work with them.

4 0

3 years ago

In Schenck v. United States (1919), the Supreme Court decided that a "clear and present danger" to the country allowed the feder

galina1969 [7]

Answer:

b. Restrict first amendment rights.

Explanation:

The Schenck v. United States (1919) Supreme Court case ruled by putting limitations on the rights of individuals if it concerns the interest of the nation. This ruling states that constitutional rights are not absolute and can be changed anytime the government sees fit.

The Supreme Court decided to issue the limits on the freedoms of individuals, especially during wartime. This ruling established the ability of the government in suppressing any speech or news that it thinks is harmful to the welfare of the nation. It stated that with concerns regarding the "clear and present danger" that can put the nation in jeopardy, the government is free to restrict the first amendment rights as and when it feels necessary.

Thus, the correct answer is option b.

3 0

3 years ago