The National Indian Youth Council (NIYC) differed from the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) because the NIYC used harsh rhetoric and direct action strategies.
<h3>What is NIYC?</h3>
- The National Indian Youth Council, Inc. (NIYC), the second-oldest Native American nonprofit in the United States, was founded in 1961.
- NIYC served primarily as an Indian environmental organization in the 1970s, bringing numerous cases on behalf of Indian communities opposed to milling, uranium mine, and strip mining on their property.
- For stopping the $6 billion coal gasification plants on the Navajo Reservation, NIYC received respect on a global scale.
- The National Indian Youth Council committed all of its efforts to making the future of our Indian People better.
- The NIYC aims to advance Native American public education and employment training, inform the public about their issues, support religious freedom, and boost political engagement.
Learn more about political organizations here:
brainly.com/question/17145092
#SPJ4
English/tiếng Anh
All of these issues are problems that affect many people in a society, rather than problems that affect only a few.
• Poverty and Homelessness. ...
• Climate Change. ...
• Overpopulation. ...
• Immigration Stresses. ...
• Civil Rights and Racial
• Discrimination. ...
• Gender Inequality. ...
• Health Care Availability. ...
• Childhood Obesity.
Vietnamese/Tiếng Việt
Tất cả những vấn đề này là những vấn đề ảnh hưởng đến nhiều người trong một xã hội, chứ không phải là những vấn đề chỉ ảnh hưởng đến một số ít.
• Nghèo đói và Vô gia cư. ...
• Khí hậu thay đổi. ...
• Dân số quá đông. ...
• Căng thẳng nhập cư. ...
• Quyền Dân sự và Phân biệt chủng tộc
• Phân biệt. ...
• Bất bình đẳng giới. ...
• Tính sẵn có của Chăm sóc Sức khỏe. ...
• Béo phì thời thơ ấu.
Yes because it is important to vote and it happens every 4 years
The answer has to be Lead away, hope that helped
John Smith and Thomas Dale had similar leadership styles because they both made strict rules. Both leaders could be considered tyrants. They both had a no nonsense approach, which made them good leaders for the Jamestown situation because the colony's survival was at stake. These are not necessarily qualities we look for today, because their styles were not democratic. -ally :)
