For the answer to the questions above, I think the most significant thing is probably manpower. The Romans had the pool of hundreds of thousands of small farmers to draw upon. The Carthaginians used mainly mercenaries and federate.<span>The Roman Govt also seems to have taken the war more seriously, as a 'total war', and mobilized all their resources earlier and more effectively. Combined with their larger manpower this meant they were able to absorb defeats more easily and continue fighting. I have read a book which used the analogy of a disciplined roman 'communist' society fighting a disinterested Carthaginian 'capitalist' society. Romans have a strong government system which is so organized and amazing how they developed that advance system that time
</span>I hope my answer helped you.
Magna Carta, which means ‘The Great Charter’, is one of the most important documents in history as it established the principle that everyone is subject to the law, even the king, and guarantees the rights of individuals, the right to justice and the right to a fair trial.
Here's some similarities to choose from:
- Both have three branches and a separation of powers
- Both governments share powers with each other (concurrent powers). Some shared powers are the permission to collect taxes and build roads.
The ancient Egyptians<span> believed that when someone </span>died<span>, their soul left their body. The soul would then return and be reunited with the body after it was buried. However, the soul needed to be able to find and recognise the body in order to live forever.</span>
