1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zielflug [23.3K]
3 years ago
6

What is the original position?

Law
1 answer:
zavuch27 [327]3 years ago
8 0
Do you have a better picture?
You might be interested in
Because of the violent nature of the crime of robbery and the imminent threat of injury, witnesses are not likely to remember ma
Marina86 [1]

Answer: The best question to ask the victim would be: What were the most noticeable features about the robber's face?

Explanation:

Because of the violent nature of the crime of robbery and the imminent threat of injury, witnesses are not likely to remember many specific details of a robbery.

It is important, however, that officers attempt to gather as much information as possible from the victim and any witnesses.

In such cases, the best question to ask the victim in order for him to disclose any details that may help identify the suspect is to ask of the most noticeable features about the suspect's face.

6 0
3 years ago
Shared left turn lanes are common on 2 lane county road true or false
WARRIOR [948]

Answer:false

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is an example of an ethical norm?
Molodets [167]

freedom should be the answer

hope this helps

God bless!

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do you suppose are strengths of dispute resolution strategies? Select all that apply. When law enforcement and community ad
Dvinal [7]

The strengths of dispute resolution strategies are that dispute resolution rarely results in arrests and is less expensive than adjudication, and focuses on resolving miscommunication and misunderstanding issues.

<h3>What is dispute resolution?</h3>

Dispute resolution is a strategy to resolve differences between two or more groups regarding an issue peacefully and through dialogue.

This method is considered the most appropriate for solving problems because it prevents disputes from ending in violent confrontations and one of those involved being injured or killed. On the contrary, this method ensures that all parties involved get their demands or needs.

According to the above, it can be inferred that as a result of dispute resolution costs can be reduced, number of arrests and it is a way to clarify the message that each one wants to express.

Learn more about communication in: brainly.com/question/22558440

#SPJ1

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Supreme Court allowed United Parcel Service employees to open packages without a warrant to inspect contents of the package
    12·1 answer
  • Define the following terms:
    5·2 answers
  • Why did the second continental congress, when drafting the articles of confederation, create a weak central government?
    6·2 answers
  • Victims can avoid being at fault for being bullied by:
    5·1 answer
  • Explain the four types of courts and their purpose.
    9·1 answer
  • Is it true that the U.S. needs to eliminate its national debt?
    13·2 answers
  • Thanks you
    13·1 answer
  • What makes administrative law different from other types of law?
    5·2 answers
  • What kind of traditional patrol do you feel is effective? Which of the suggested changes do you support?
    11·1 answer
  • Document the incident to
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!