Answer:
I believe that it was either code of hammurabi or roman law.
Answer:
Explanation:
it is not the stores fault, she is responsible
Answer:
is this an essay or short answer question?
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
The amendment becomes part of the constitution.
Explanation:
After congress has approved a proposed amendment to the constitution, then the amendment becomes part of the constitution: an amendment becomes part of the constitution after it is proposed by two-thirds of the House of Representatives and Senate, and ratified by three-quarters of the States (which is 38 of the 50 States in USA).
