1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
masya89 [10]
1 year ago
15

According to the ___________ doctrine, officers are permitted to search and to seize evidence, without a warrant, on private pro

perty beyond the area immediately surrounding the house.
Law
1 answer:
Salsk061 [2.6K]1 year ago
7 0

The open field doctrine states that officers are allowed to search and take evidence on private property outside of the immediate vicinity of a dwelling without obtaining a warrant.

- A "warrantless search of the area outside a property owner's curtilage" does not violate the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, according to the open-fields doctrine (also known as the open-field doctrine or open-fields rule) in American criminal procedural law.

- Explains that as long as objects are immediately recognizable as being subject to seizure and are within the sight of an officer who is legally present in the location from where the view is made, they may be properly confiscated without a warrant (illegal).  

To know more about doctrine, kindly click on the link below :

brainly.com/question/11271619?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

   

You might be interested in
In one of his tweets, President Trump wrote about so-called "Obama judges". Chief Justice Roberts responds by saying "there are
charle [14.2K]

Answer:

They are both right because Barack Obama was the one who elected the justices into the Supreme Court but they are of course in no way connected to Barack Obama except for the fact that he was the one who elected them into the court.

7 0
3 years ago
What computer crimes are covered by State laws?
lisabon 2012 [21]

Answer:

I assume you want to know what computer-based crimes are against the law and have consequences.

Explanation:

Online Identity Theft, Obtaining information concerning a person, Obtaining information for free that costs the public a fee, Encrypting or decrypting data, etc. In certain states like Alaska these are considered as a Class C felony.

(P.S. FindLaw is a good website to help with subjects like this)

8 0
3 years ago
Patricia Plaintiff files a lawsuit against Donald Defendant for breach of contract. The law that governs the subject area of her
MrMuchimi

Explanation:

state statutory and common (judge-made) law and private law.

4 0
2 years ago
if a teacher does not follow their school district's rule, is it illegal? are there any consequences if they do not obey the rul
Lisa [10]
Yes it is illegal they could get in trouble
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP!! If anyone knows anything about OJ Simpson can you please comment or something I need loadsss of help for my forensic scie
murzikaleks [220]

Answer:

dude was a football player and ran from the cops once he killed someone thats all i know.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Djdnxhrbjgenshsvdudvehdydbdhdudhbddhd
    9·2 answers
  • 4. Investigate any one court case from the "Court Cases to Know" assignment.
    13·1 answer
  • Should Jennifer be made to go to school, if the money she makes working helps support her family? A 13-year-old who works is a v
    6·1 answer
  • An agent attends a conference where officers of publicly held companies give talks about their companies to increase investor aw
    7·1 answer
  • Why might the government not want to give lawyers to every single person accused of any
    10·1 answer
  • The concepts of Expectation, Reliance and Nominal damages are incompatible with Sections 73 and 74 of Contract Act. Furthermore,
    6·1 answer
  • Discuss the effect of absence of rule of law​​
    15·1 answer
  • Most homicides involve victims who are ______ and offenders who are _______
    7·1 answer
  • How do i do this?
    11·1 answer
  • The U.S. Constitution establishes that an accused person is presumed to be innocent, until he or she is proven guilty. This part
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!