The standard for evaluating sources has been matched with their descriptions as follows:
- Trustworthiness: The issue is addressed from a balanced and fair viewpoint.
- Relevance: The text gives information related to your topic.
- Authority: The writer of the text has experience or expertise on the topic.
- Currency: The information is up-to-date.
<h3>What are the standards for evaluating sources?</h3>
The standards for evaluating sources are the benchmarks that are used to proof articles for accuracy.
Before the information contained in a material can be accepted, the content should be free from bias. It should also be relevant and come from a credible and reliable source.
Learn more about the evaluation of sources here:
brainly.com/question/11916196
#SPJ1
Answer:
First choice.
Explanation:
it's the first choice because the writer is developing a story that isn't clear on who's bad or good, so which indicates that the writer is confused.
Answer:
Having a good career that we like can help us maintain motivation.
Explanation:
If you don't have a career you like it can be difficult to want or desire working. For example, if you are an artistic person who loves music and painting, you would probably not want a job as a plumber, or electrician.
The first one The third one and the last one
Answer:
The conspirators do not want to let Cicero in on their plot to assassinate Julius Caesar because Cicero apparently is a poor follower. In Act II, Scene 1, Cassius suggests that Cicero be included. Casca, Cinna, and Metellus support that idea.
HOPE THIS HELPED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!XDDDDD
