Answer:
In Europe, the Crusades led to economic expansion; increased trade and use of money, which undermined serfdom and led to prosperity of northern Italian cities. They led to increased power of the monarchs, and, briefly, to increased power of the papacy.
Answer:
No, Qin Shih Huang Ti, was the emperor. No more was feudalism know legalism. Fell due to weak son. unification of china politically and economically, great wall, unified language, roads etc.
Explanation:
Answer:
Civilization has become more complex and judgemental.
Explanation:
I think this because now there are phones, cars, and clothes. Back in the 1950s, there was no touchscreen phones or computers. And peoples opinions of everything have changed as well, there is racism and stereotypes. People have explored the depths of the sea with contraptions, they have made them better, more helpful to society. People thought back then that being on a computer was being a nerd, now its ¨cool¨ to be on a device. A lot of people judge others on what they look like, not what their personality says. People dont really understand the meaning of things like they used to. Some people rely on others to do their work, not really understanding the subject of it all. Civilization has found newer things to build with, such as glass, concrete, bricks, etc... but some of us have lost love and care for our Earth, we just take and never give back.
between a strong central government and the public interest."It is rather to argue that in politics there are no immaculate conceptions, and that in the drive for a stronger general government motives of all sorts played a part, common good or public interest that militated against their private status."
1. It encourages international cooperation.
- true!
It
leads to peaceful resolutions of international
conflicts. - well, a bit, but only as an extension of the frist thing- so the frist one is a better option!
It protects fragile ecosystems. - nothing to do with that!
It provides jobs for workers
in developed nations. - not, rather in the developing nation
Which is an argument against free trade?
It can limit environmental protection measures. - i don't think this is a very good option, but its the best of those given. Let's say that one country prohibits production which is enviromentally harmful, but cheap: a free trade would challenge this deciosn.
It leads to
international conflict. - no, i don't think so
It increases the prices for many products. -no, it rather decreases
It
violates basic economic principles.
- no, i don't think si
