1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ilya [14]
3 years ago
10

Compare and contrast Roosevelt and Taft's Progressivism?

History
1 answer:
ira [324]3 years ago
4 0

<u>Roosevelt and Taft's Progressivism:</u>

<u>Roosevelt Progressivism:</u>

  • Roosevelt won 88 constituent votes.  
  • A Progressive reformer, Roosevelt earned a notoriety for being a "trust buster" through his administrative changes and antitrust indictments.  
  • Roosevelt bolstered stricter guidelines of a large business.  
  • Roosevelt had filled in as president from 1901 to 1909, getting progressively dynamic in the later long periods of his administration.  
  • He focused on protection and set up numerous new national parks, backwoods, and landmarks planned to save the country's normal assets.

<u>Taft's Progressivism:</u>

  • Taft conveyed only two states, taking 8 appointive votes.  
  • In spite of the fact that Taft had never held elective office, he had long periods of open assistance behind him.  
  • Taft needed taxes to be brought down.  
  • Two of the significant dynamic accomplishments under President Taft were protected corrections.  
  • He had been an examiner and judge, U.S. specialist general under President Harrison, the primary non military personnel legislative head of the Philippines, and Roosevelt's Secretary of War.
You might be interested in
What was one difference between the maya and aztec governments
Vitek1552 [10]
The Aztec empire was ruled by one ruler where the Mayan had rule divided among the different states 
8 0
3 years ago
What was a flapper? (ASAP)
Gekata [30.6K]
Flappers were a generation of young Western women in the 1920s who wore skirts, bobbed their hair, listened to jazz, and flaunted their disdain for what was then considered acceptable behavior.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did European nations send missionaries to convert people in africa and Asia to Christianity?​
Luda [366]

to save the peoplee from affrica because the chosen ose was going to come soon (god)

3 0
3 years ago
Many other Americans have followed Carnegie’s lead and done the same thing, for example
Pie

Answer:

As discussed previously, new processes in steel refining, along with inventions in the fields of communications and electricity, transformed the business landscape of the nineteenth century. The exploitation of these new technologies provided opportunities for tremendous growth, and business entrepreneurs with financial backing and the right mix of business acumen and ambition could make their fortunes. Some of these new millionaires were known in their day as robber barons, a negative term that connoted the belief that they exploited workers and bent laws to succeed. Regardless of how they were perceived, these businessmen and the companies they created revolutionized American industry.

RAILROADS AND ROBBER BARONS

Earlier in the nineteenth century, the first transcontinental railroad and subsequent spur lines paved the way for rapid and explosive railway growth, as well as stimulated growth in the iron, wood, coal, and other related industries. The railroad industry quickly became the nation’s first “big business.” A powerful, inexpensive, and consistent form of transportation, railroads accelerated the development of virtually every other industry in the country. By 1890, railroad lines covered nearly every corner of the United States, bringing raw materials to industrial factories and finished goods to consumer markets. The amount of track grew from 35,000 miles at the end of the Civil War to over 200,000 miles by the close of the century. Inventions such as car couplers, air brakes, and Pullman passenger cars allowed the volume of both freight and people to increase steadily. From 1877 to 1890, both the amount of goods and the number of passengers traveling the rails tripled.

Financing for all of this growth came through a combination of private capital and government loans and grants. Federal and state loans of cash and land grants totaled $150 million and 185 million acres of public land, respectively. Railroads also listed their stocks and bonds on the New York Stock Exchange to attract investors from both within the United States and Europe. Individual investors consolidated their power as railroads merged and companies grew in size and power. These individuals became some of the wealthiest Americans the country had ever known. Midwest farmers, angry at large railroad owners for their exploitative business practices, came to refer to them as “robber barons,” as their business dealings were frequently shady and exploitative. Among their highly questionable tactics was the practice of differential shipping rates, in which larger business enterprises received discounted rates to transport their goods, as opposed to local producers and farmers whose higher rates essentially subsidized the discounts.

Jay Gould was perhaps the first prominent railroad magnate to be tarred with the “robber baron” brush. He bought older, smaller, rundown railroads, offered minimal improvements, and then capitalized on factory owners’ desires to ship their goods on this increasingly popular and more cost-efficient form of transportation. His work with the Erie Railroad was notorious among other investors, as he drove the company to near ruin in a failed attempt to attract foreign investors during a takeover attempt. His model worked better in the American West, where the railroads were still widely scattered across the country, forcing farmers and businesses to pay whatever prices Gould demanded in order to use his trains. In addition to owning the Union Pacific Railroad that helped to construct the original transcontinental railroad line, Gould came to control over ten thousand miles of track across the United States, accounting for 15 percent of all railroad transportation. When he died in 1892, Gould had a personal worth of over $100 million, although he was a deeply unpopular figure.

In contrast to Gould’s exploitative business model, which focused on financial profit more than on tangible industrial contributions, Commodore Cornelius Vanderbilt was a “robber baron” who truly cared about the success of his railroad enterprise and its positive impact on the American economy. Vanderbilt consolidated several smaller railroad lines, called trunk lines, to create the powerful New York Central Railroad Company, one of the largest corporations in the United States at the time. He later purchased stock in the major rail lines that would connect his company to Chicago, thus expanding his reach and power while simultaneously creating a railroad network to connect Chicago to New York City. This consolidation provided more efficient connections from Midwestern suppliers to eastern markets. It was through such consolidation that, by 1900, seven major railroad tycoons controlled over 70 percent of all operating lines. Vanderbilt’s personal wealth at his death (over $100 million in 1877), placed him among the top three wealthiest individuals in American history.

6 0
3 years ago
Why were there fewer industries in the South that the North in the mid 1800s?
ale4655 [162]
I think this is because of the major plantations in the south. the north had plants or crops but only substantial (enough to feed family). the north mainly focused on things like their ships and other major industries. the south focused on plantations and had little to no industries
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • To determine whether a piece of historical evidence is reliable, historians
    8·2 answers
  • Name two factors that helped hundreds of spanish soldiers
    9·1 answer
  • What happens to a public party after it has been implemented
    9·1 answer
  • Which two of the following are ways in which England's monarchy changed after the Glorious Revolution?
    10·2 answers
  • HC)Why is the Franco-Prussian War considered an important development in the history of Europe?
    5·1 answer
  • At 180 degrees longitude, the __________ represents the point at which the Eastern and Western Hemispheres experience different
    12·1 answer
  • Note: The item below has been reviewed and is scheduled to be updated. All students will receive full credit for any response to
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the french and indian war worsen the relationship between great britain and the colonists
    15·2 answers
  • Why and how did the Christian<br> church become more organized in the second and third centuries?
    15·1 answer
  • Explain what HUAC was?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!