Answer:
Any Trans Person of Color
Explanation:
Personally, Im thinking of Laverne Cox who happens to be a transgender female which already has its own realm of discrimination but on top of that is a POC. Thoes two things are apart of her social identity BUT overlap in discrimiantion.
Answer:B....Workplace cliques can cause horizontal disharmony
Explanation:
Answer:
State law is the body of laws for a state, but the rule of law is a principle.
Explanation:
The laws of a state are about the individuals laws each state can have in U.S. regarding some matters. While rule of law is a principle that highlights the sovereign of the law, which means all people, institutions and the government are under it. A constitutional theorist called Dicey wrote the rule of law should follow: “equality before law; presumption of innocence unless proven guilty and primacy of rights over Constitution”.
- How can photos be used as alternate forms of argument?
It can be used as a visual proof to convince others about your point.
Argument often derived from personal conviction. This personal conviction often really hard to get rid off even if the oppositions provides a clear and logical argument to debunk it.
Visual proof often harder to deny since it can depict a certain situation in a more convincing way rather than personal recollection . Often times, this can be a lot stronger compared to trying to convince others simply by using words.
- Can a photo convince you to take a specific action or to think a certain way?
Absolutely.
For example, Let's say that you hear 2 people arguing in the court. Person A accused person B for killing person C at December 12th. Person B denied the accusation.
At this point, you probably not really sure who's in the right.
But, let's say that<u> person B showed a photo that proved he is actually in another city</u> on December 12th and it is impossible for him to be at the crime scene on the time of person C attack.
That photo could easily win the argument in person B's favor and convince others who witness it that he is telling the truth.
Answer:
The case can move up to an appeal or superior court.
Explanation:
If a legal error made by the previous judge or peace is successfully argued to the appeal/superior court, then the case will be reheard. This process can continue up to the supreme court (the highest court of the land in most jurisdictions), where a final judgement will be made. No "moving up" can occur after the case is judged by the supreme court.
