The largest part of government spending is fixed and cannot be easily reduced was the reason behind the difficulty for the federal government to make large cuts in spending.
<h3><u>Explanation: </u></h3>
The US budget allocation is divided into different categories and more than half is for mandatory spending which the government cannot alter easily. Examples include social security and medical care, and to show the spending example in 2017 Financial year, Medical care spent 27% of spending costs and Social security spent 24% while other departments and agencies spent a maximum of 15%.
Payment for mandatory expenditures should meet criteria specified by the law while discretionary payments are renewed annually as part of the budget and planning process.
Answer:
Government is predicated upon the initiation of force. For example, if you were to stop paying your taxes, you would get a letter from the IRS saying you owe such and such amount. They would keep sending you these letters for a while, but eventually they would send a group of men with badges and guns to throw you in a cage for not giving this institution YOUR money.
Courts are often crowded because of overcriminalization (prosecuting individuals for victimless crimes) and there is no price associated with criminal cases. Cases often get plea bargained because prosecutors have an incentive to have high conviction rates, not to serve their clients since they are paid by the state. This often means that crimes that are easier to prosecute get more attention.
Also you have the current problem where people sue each other willy nilly. This problem could be solved by simply requiring the person who brings suit to pay for the defendant's legal expenses if the defendant is proven innocent of any wrongdoing.
Also the victim of a crime in our current system gets screwed twice. Once by the offender who perpetrated the crime, then again by the state, which confiscates his wealth in order to pay for the prosecution and housing of the criminal. Historically private law was centered around compensating the victim financially.
In absence of a state professional judges would emerge that would make decisions based on a commonly established practices which could be codified into a law book. This would be analogous to how dictionaries codify definitions for words, you don’t need a central body to come up with new words and definitions, language emerges spontaneously. So too, law would be established in this way and in fact this is what English common law is based on, communal law that was established and accepted by the community. Similarly customs would emerge for the amount of times you can appeal, based on the crime committed.
Private law would solve many of the above problems listed. It would eliminate overcriminalization (it would be unlikely that someone would bring suit against someone for using drugs), it would focus on restitution and lawyers would be working for the victims instead of simply working for a high conviction rate.
Answer:
The teacher's remote behaviour towards June most likely reflects a Narcissistic behaviour.
Explanation:
Being narcissistic is a form of psychological disorder in which a person or an individual have an elevated or superior feeling of themselves. An in-depth sense of attention or importance of one self. In this case, June both June and the teacher posses the trait of being narcissistic.
The militart was using force to subdue uprisings
Answer:
Monsoon is considered to be both blessing and curse because ;
monsoon brings rain which is very essential to every living organisms.
much rain brings flood and destroys everything .
Wet season- Helps their crops grow.
Dry season- ruins the crops
Explanation:
