A major difference was that Roosevelt felt that the government spending to help people who were in economic trouble, was much more acceptable than Hoover thought it was. Hoover believed in the idea of "rugged individualism" in which people are largely responsible for their own welfare.
I believe the answer is A. Hope this Helps!!
Answer: The 3rd Amendment
Explanation: The third amendment states this: "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law."
The course of World War II, leading up to the end of 1940, was an
expansion of territory by the country of Germany. Germany was
beginning to invade its neighboring countries. http://www.answers.com/Q/Describe_the_course_of_World_War_2_in_europe_until_the_end_of_1940
This is a matter of opinion.
If you think yes, you could argue that internment was a great PR move and/or that it protected the Japanese living in America from negative press
If you argue no (which I would) then you could argue that it was unconstitutional and/or had no strategic importance to the war itself.
