Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
Answer:
Amish dont use technology, that includes gas cars line R.V's
Explanation:
unless you are talking about some other sort of R.V.
Answer:
Dehliwal were the coins that were in circulation in the region under the tomaras.
Explanation:
Coins called 'dehliwal' were also manufactured and circulated Delhi.
is that Right?
The membrane component that is important for allowing large charged molecules to pass through the membrane are TRANS MEMBRANE PROTEINS.
Trans membrane proteins are a type of integral proteins which spans the entirety of the biological membrane to which they are attached. Trans membrane protein function as gateway which permit the passage of specific substances across the membrane.
Answer: 1. Could Tony have done otherwise than to commit his crimes?
Ans= YES.
2. Should he be held responsible for his actions?
Ans= YES.
3. Why?
Ans= Tony was brought up by his parents to the best of their abilities according to the passage. For every human being, there is always a point where you have the ability to make decisions that would determine your outcome in life, in the case of Tony he would have been opportuned to become something better but he decided to continue to tread the path which he did. If he had decided to be something else, he would have achieved it.
Lastly, according to the passage above Tony made a statement "he joked that he would return to fill out an application for the soon to be vacant manager position", this is to show he was not remorseful about his evil deed. So therefore, he should be held responsible for his actions.
Explanation:
