The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
examples of positive and negative effects of the military regime
The positives are that a military regime is so discipline and strict enough to make people focus and work under heavy scrutiny and supervision to accomplish goals. Many times this is the only path to start to do more and better things, with discipline, perseverance, and order. That is exactly why strict disciplined, without flexibility, is referred to as military discipline. Let's have in mind that soldiers have no room for flexibility, thinking, or feedback. Soldiers simply follow orders and directions.
For instance, General Douglass McArthur's military regime after World War in Japan, trying to help Japan to reconstruct after the two atomic bomb explosions. His military planning goals, plus the focused discipline of the Japanese, made Japan a modern superpower in just a few years.
On the other hand, the negatives. People are no soldiers and like to enjoy their liberties. Under a military regime, there are no liberties. The military is in full command. Many times, under this type of regime, liberties are suppressed or controlled. THis is the opposite of a democracy.
We can see many examples of military regimes in the Middle East and Africa. People have no liberties and many times tyrannic military dictators oppress the citizens.
Answer:
clear vision
Explanation:
maybe because if it swims at night it needs good eyesight to see
Answer:
Thats a tricky answer i think no guns or other stuff that adults do would be the right thing
Explanation:
Answer:
C) slaves were included in religion more than ever before
Explanation:
The evangelical drive at the core of the Second Great Awakening shared a portion of the populist push of Revolutionary ideals. Evangelical churches by and large had a populist orientation that favored ordinary individuals over elites.
Fearing the Christian message of spiritual equality, slave proprietors at first opposed evangelicals lecturing their bond people, however as the revival movement spread, a few came to think of it as their Christian obligation to teach their slaves about the Bible.
