Answer:
Junaluska saved the life of Andrew Jackson and later regretted his act because Jackson denied helping Junaluska and his people when they needed help.
Explanation:
Junaluska was the chief of the Cherokee tribe of the Native American. The tribe resided in the North Carolina. Junaluska saved Andrew Jackson's life while he fought alongside him in the Battle of Horseshoe Bend. But, Junaluska, had to regret his act of bravery later in his life. He saved Jackson's life from a creek pow, whom Andrew was investigating at the time of battle. While investigation the person attacked Jackson with a knife and Junaluska saved Jackson's life by tripping the attacker.
<u>But, Jackson proved to be a notorious. During the Trail of Tear in 1838, Jackson and his people incarcerated Junaluska and his people. When Junaluska came to Jackson regarding the Indian Removal Act, he was denied help. Jackson denied helping Junaluska saying that he can not do anything to help him or his people. Junaluska even cried to God regretting his act of saving Jackson and thinking of American history would have been different if he would have known Jackson's true face.</u>
after reading this i think that the answer is B, because their perspective is made by personal experiences
Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was <em>neutral</em>, a<em> calm </em>and <em>calculated/prudent </em>person. he was considered<em> unique </em>and <em>very special </em>for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as <em>very </em><span><em>ambitious</em> (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very <em>firm</em> when it was about facing his <span>opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more <em>powerful </em>than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (<em>diverse</em>) made him <em>fascinating''</em>. He was hostile to his older brother. He had a military, legislative and <span>diplomatic talent. |He was<em> popular</em>, but his more of defects were: picky (<span>squeamish), selfish, egocentric.</span></span></span></span>
Answer:
<u><em>They protected the home country’s economy at the colonists’ expense</em></u>.
Explanation:
Interestingly this colonist where affected after the Wool Act because it resulted in higher value of British clothes as a result of export ban of foreign wool.
The Iron Act which was meant to increase local iron production was opposed because they were resulting in losses for the growing iron and steel companies.
