One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
To improve its economy, the Government of Ireland did not : D. Cut local taxes
By not cutting local taxes, the domestic businesses in ireland will have more disposable income to expand their businesses, which will improve ireland's economy in the future
<span>When people group several concepts together, such as baseball, basketball, and football, based on the shared property of being ball sports, they are creating a CATEGORY of the concept
category of a concept refers to shared similarities that more than one objects have with one another. Another example of this is when people group several animals such as lion, wolf, and bear based on their danger.</span>
The nexus requirement holds that an act that is considered joint activity must have some relationship to the act of justice that the defendant is seeking to avoid.
The prosecutor must prove that the defendant acted on the basis of common sense necessary for the crime when he committed the voluntary act (or unlawful omission) necessary for the crime.
An error as to material fact may give rise to reasonable suspicion that the defendant possessed the degree of nexus requirements in the human common sense necessary to impose criminal responsibility so that such an error would be considered a lack of evidence. It is true that it is sometimes used as a defense.
Learn more about nexus requirements at
brainly.com/question/20736948
#SPJ4
Answer:
A. The government did not interfere with the normal means of production.
