Well, you might be wondering what country "nacirema" comes from, you might have checked the world map and couldn't find it there, you might be sitting down and wondering what kind of strange culture/tribe allows peoples body to be used for ritual, okay, let me disappoint you, nacirema is actually America written backward.
Based on this, we tend to see other cultures as weird and horrible, we look down on them and wish they could be wiped off the map, there seems to be a us vs them, we feel we are better and shouldn't associate with such people or culture. They, on the other hand, view us as the strongest, richest and most powerful nation in the world, however, they still view us as a people who discriminate against other cultures, they view us as been rude and cruel to their culture, we often laugh at them when they speak, just becuase they dont speak like Americans, to us our perspective is the only one that's truly right, but the truth is, every culture is unique.
Answer:
d. ability to set specific guidelines after receiving a general mandate from Congress
Explanation:
Bureaucracy is the way of governance by the government official following the rules and regulations of the government to ensure proper functioning of the government as well as good governance.
The federal bureaucracy of the United States performs mainly three tasks in the government -- administration, implementation and regulation.
They set guidelines and frameworks for the policies of the government after they receive the mandate from the Congress. They have a very little role in convincing Congress or mediating conflicts.
Hence the correct option is (d).
Answer:
Explanation:
A "conference committee" is a committee of the United States Congress, as appointed by the Senate and The House of Representatives to resolve upon lack of agreement in respect to a specific bill. Usually, it is composed by the most senior members of each House´s standing committees, as having originally studied the bill.
A significant portion of psychological experts suggest that
they are not very good at predicting future violence. This notwithstanding, law courts usually uphold
psychological experts’ legitimacy on offering testimony on an individual’s
future dangerousness, especially while determining whether a death sentence is
appropriate or not.