1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elena-2011 [213]
3 years ago
14

BRAINLIEST! PLEASE HELP!

History
1 answer:
den301095 [7]3 years ago
8 0
In the long history of European colonialism, some colonialists did better by their colonies than others, and the legacy is mostly one of still-enduring pain. For example, virtually no one save Newt Gingrich<span> thinks the Belgians did much of a job in Central Africa, where their mistakes included artificially dividing the population into Hutus and Tutsis, precipitating one of the continent's worst humanitarian disasters. But many historians generally consider the British presence in India, while </span>at times<span> horrifically </span>violent, to be one of the most benevolent and productive in colonial history. Was it a net gain for India? Or did it cause more harm than good? <span>India's democracy is truly extraordinary. ... India's political system owes much to the institutions put in place by the British over two hundred years ago. In many other parts of Asia and in Africa, the British were a relatively temporary presence. They were in India for centuries. They saw it as the jewel in their imperial crown and built lasting institutions of government throughout the country--courts, universities, administrative agencies. But perhaps even more importantly, India got very lucky with the vehicle of its independence, the Congress Party, and its first generations of post-independence leaders, who nurtured the best traditions of the British and drew on older Indian customs to reinforce them. 

hope this helps
</span>
You might be interested in
1) How did pictured Leo Frank exemplify antisemitism in Georgia during
crimeas [40]

Answer:

I think it's A. I could be wrong lol

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What was the most likely motivation for Iraqis to set fire to oil wells in Kuwait?
Gala2k [10]

Answer:

revenge

Explanation:

What was the most likely motivation for Iraqis to set fire to oil wells in Kuwait? They hoped to set off explosions to kill enemy troops and win the war. They wanted revenge when they were forced to retreat from Kuwait.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP PLEASE GOTTA SUMBIT IN 1 Hour!!
ikadub [295]

Answer:

When minie balls enter the body, they flatten out, tearing tissue and hitting bones, which then shatter into splinters that could potentially puncture organs.

3 0
3 years ago
Which are characteristics of a mercantilist system? (Select all that apply.)
Talja [164]
A) and C) and E) :)))
5 0
3 years ago
Before Ronald Reagan became governor of California, he was
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

Holly wood actor

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • (WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST)Which tactic did Genghis Khan use to build his empire?
    8·1 answer
  • List the four freedoms of the first amendment
    12·2 answers
  • Which factors was the most affecting humans lives
    8·1 answer
  • Was the quarantine speech isolation or intervention
    14·2 answers
  • How many people (or country's) did Adolf Hitler kill during his time of rein and terror?
    6·2 answers
  • How many years did these dynasties last?
    10·1 answer
  • George Mason had the most influence on-
    7·1 answer
  • World War II resulted in increased attention to which of these by the Roosevelt administration?
    10·1 answer
  • What dispute contributed to the out break of world war 1
    5·1 answer
  • How did humanism impact Europeans thinking about government
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!