Answer:
It is important that this map presents:
- The borders of the Roman Empire.
- The location of important commercial ports.
- The location of cities that were commercial centers.
- The location of land and sea trade routes.
Explanation:
If the Romans needed to draw up a trade map, it would be necessary for that map to present important information for Roman trade, allowing that trade to be very efficient in promoting wealth and power.
In this case, the most important thing was that this map presented the borders of the Roman Empire. This information would allow the Romans to have a sense of where they were located in the universe and which path they should follow to achieve the established commercial goal. They would also have a sense of the distance between Rome and the destination.
This place of destination should be represented on the map and as this map has commercial purposes, it would be necessary for it to present the main ports and cities that were commercial centers in their regions, which would help the Roman navigators to find them as quickly as possible.
It was also important that the maps show the path that the Romans should follow to reach the large commercial centers, for this reason, the map should show the maritime and land trade routes.
I think it’s A.
because is the Quran we have commandments to follow and in the bible there is commandments to follow as well and in the most of the holly books.
i hope that helps :))
The Atlantic Ocean and the Pacific Ocean. The term Manifest Destiny was first used by John O'Sullivan, a newspaper editor in 1845, to describe the prevailing American mindset that all lands from coast to coast are destined to belong to the United States. This mindset was reinforced by the Lewis and Clark Expedition in the early 1800s, which scouted out the American West and came into fruition with the completion of the transcontinental railroad in 1869.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although you did not attach any context to the above-mentioned quotation or further references, we are going to assume that you are referring to Solidarity, the social moment in Poland that turned into a worker union that opposed the Communist government.
I have to say that a don't agree with the statement ‘Solidarity died as quickly as it started, having achieved nothing."
I consider that the Solidarity movement in Poland accomplished many things. Indeed, the strike of August 14, 1980, changed the political scenario in Eastern Europe.
The leader of the movement was Lech Walesa. Years later he won the presidential election of Poland. His victory and Vacláv Havel’s victory to become President of Czechoslovakia signified the transformation of Eastern Europe from dominance by the Soviet Union to new democracies.
So what started as a union movement in Communist time in Poland, ended up being a political party that got to power when Lech Walesa became the President of Poland in December 1990.
