Answer:
c. Liquidity is the ability to convert assets to cash.
Explanation:
The company's level of liquidity deals with the company's level of cash which is usually held to meet current obligations.
The liquidity ratios are ratios that indicate how well and quickly a company can convert current assets into cash for the settlement of current liabilities.
Examples of liquidity ratios include current ratio, acid test/quick ratio , cash ratio and working capital ratio.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Distribution.
Explanation:
To begin with, the concept of distribution inside the marketing field and refering specifically to the internal marketing approach is understand as the way that the informatino of the marketing strategy is distributed inside the organization with all of the members that need to know that data in order to focus on the campaign and make it possible and effective so that the objectives are accomplished. That is why that the planning sessions, workshops, formal reports and personal conversations are part of the internal distribution that is necessary to implement the marketing strategy that the company tends to use.
Answer:
it depends on the job but it is a Anesthesiologists
Answer:
D. Financial measures are lead indicators of future success.
Explanation:
This is said to be not true regarding financial and non financial measures of performance.
Businesswise, it is often debated whether a commonly perceived good company, as defined by characteristics such as competitive advantage, stable earnings, above-average management, and market leadership, is also a good company in which to invest. While these characteristics of a good company can point toward a good investment, this article will explain how to also evaluate the company's financial characteristics and how to know if a company is a good investment.
Answer:
These are the options for the question:
- Breach of duty.
- Strict liability.
- Recklessness.
- Negligence per se
And this is the correct answer:
Explanation:
Negligence per se consist in act that is neglectful, or unlawful, because it explicitely violates a statue or regulation.
In this case, the statue was the new state law that required smoke detectors to be maintained. The company that installed the smoke detector inside Jose's house clearly did not maintain the detector because otherwise, it would have gone off when the fire started, and Jose probably would not have died.
It is a negligence per se from the smoke detector company, and Jose's wife can lawfully sue them for that very reason.
