Nate finds the language of the contract to buy bedroom furniture difficult to understand due to "procedural unconscionability".
<h3>What is
procedural unconscionability?</h3>
Unconscionability that results from the contract-making process rather than from a contract's terms that are inherently unfair or unreasonable
Examples of Procedural Unconscionability is-
- influencing an underprivileged party who would not have otherwise signed the contract to do so.
- minimising important clauses in contracts for the sake of the underdog.
- If one side uses threats of violence against the other party, his family, or friends, this is known as coercion.
Therefore, Procedural unconscionability is based on elements that deprive a party of a meaningful choice, such as customer ignorance or a significant amount of unclear fine print.
To know more about elements required in contract-making, here
brainly.com/question/8116487
#SPJ4
Answer: $30000
Explanation:
Based on the information given in the question, the required reserve will be:
= $60000 × 25%
= $15000
Since the bank's required and excess reserves are equal, then the excess reserve will be $15000.
Therefore, the actual reserves will be:
= Required reserve + Actual reserve
= $15000 + $15000
= $30000
Implementing its sister strategy, the fiscal policy. This makes changes to tax levels so if consumer spending has declined, the taxes can be lowered so people have more money to spend, thus increasing consumer spending.
In this question the options are missing; here are the options:
Which best describes how Greg could find more information about the website to check for its validation?
Greg could assume it is valid because it is a .net.
Greg could look at the contact page to validate Frank's expertise.
Greg could look to see if the website was updated recently,
Greg could assume it is valid since Frank is not selling anything.
The answer to this question is B. Greg could look at the contact page to validate Frank's expertise.
Explanation:
One of the key factors that make a source to be credible is the expertise of the author because if the author is an expert in the area, the source is generally considered as credible. For example, the words of Isaac Newton are a credible source if these are related to areas such as maths, physics, or astronomy because he was an expert in this area. In this context, one way Greg could validate this source is by checking who is Frank Smith to verify if he is an expert in the topic. This makes option B correct.
. Nearly half (47%) of adults in their 40s and 50s have a parent age 65 or older and are either raising a young child or financially supporting a grown child (age 18 or older). And about one-in-seven middle-aged adults (15%) is providing financial support to both an aging parent and a child.
Not sure if this helps any