1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dezoksy [38]
4 years ago
13

Why did the transition to collectivization result in widespread starvation?

History
2 answers:
morpeh [17]4 years ago
5 0
<span>The peasants would be unable to provide enough for the quotas and so their goods were simply taken away from them and instead were given to the cities and the military. Millions of peasants as a result would starve to death and would end up moving to the cities where all of the food was being sent.</span>
pshichka [43]4 years ago
3 0
The government forced civilization of agriculture.  <span />
You might be interested in
How is a city legally defined in the u.s ?
tresset_1 [31]
<span>according to united states, a city is an urban unit with clear boundaries and a degree of Autonomy. Even though it may not be something that would affect many people, a city is allowed (to some extent) to create their own regulation regarding how the city should be run</span>
6 0
3 years ago
The Aztecs believed if they did not sacrifice humans ______.
zvonat [6]

the answer is C the sun would not rise each morning

they believed that human sacrifices nurished the gods

3 0
3 years ago
What was a barrier to industry developing in the South?
ANTONII [103]

Barriers to industry developing in the south:

Farming was important, not new business due to cotton.

People did not put capital, or money to invest in business, new industry did not develop.

Market for manufactured goods was smaller.

Some southerns did not want industry.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
-12 plus 8 plus -5 plus 7 =
Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

-2

Explanation:

-2 is the right answer.

Hope this helps.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
One reason the colonists had difficulty coming together to revolt against Britain is because they:
AnnyKZ [126]
<span>D. Lacked a unified army. Each colony had a militia which was made up of farmers and untrained men. The colonies had very few common factors pulling them together as a unit. To fight against the British meant fighting without the army that they once belonged or fighting with men that were untrained. Men were asked to join colonial militias which required them to leave their fields and work to fight for a dangerous cause against the British. </span>
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In ancient Asia how would people communicate?
    7·1 answer
  • What was the most significant effect that world war 1 had on russia
    12·1 answer
  • Why did guilds want to influence the city government?
    9·1 answer
  • true or false: If posters were the first building block in Hitler’s mastery of propaganda, the second building block was the cre
    10·1 answer
  • Which reasons were given by President Bush to justify the invasion of Iraq in 2003?
    10·1 answer
  • Who won the battle of Galveston?
    13·2 answers
  • How did William tweed Garner votes to be elected to the US House of Representatives
    12·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE, VERY EASY
    15·2 answers
  • Hook sentences for the mexican american war
    12·1 answer
  • To declare war, coin money, and levy taxes are examples of which type of power? ​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!