Answer:
D. Land and construction costs are comparatively less expensive in Russia than in Canada
Explanation:
Option D would favor Russia ahead of Canada because of the fact that manufacturing costs are cheaper and they have easier access to Capital. I came to this conclusion since it has been stated that land and construction costs are cheaper in Russia.
In Economics the goal of every firm is to minimize cost and to maximize profit. Option D is cost minimizing for cool cars if they want to duplicate their overall success.
Answer:
The subsidiary reports cost of goods sold at A. $660,000.
Explanation:
Cost of goods sold is the direct cost of producing or purchasing the goods sold by a business. The formula for cost of goods sold is as follows:
Cost of goods sold = Opening inventory + Purchases - Closing inventory
The subsidiary calculates its cost of goods sold as follows.
Opening inventory $120,000
Add: Purchases $720,000
Less: Closing inventory ($180,000)
Cost of goods sold $660,000
Therefore, the correct option is A. $660,000.
Mobile advertising is an internet marketing platform directed towards a certain target market using their mobile phones and tablets. The approach is centered on connecting with clients via email, SMS, MMS, social media, and mobile applications.
Mobile advertising is a multi-channel, digital marketing strategy that uses websites, emails, SMS and MMS, social media, apps, and other mobile devices to connect with a target audience.
Promotions provided by SMS text messaging, MMS multimedia messaging, downloaded apps using push notifications, in-app or in-game marketing, mobile websites, or by using a media to scan QR codes are all examples of mobile advertising.
To learn more about marketing, click here.
brainly.com/question/13414268
#SPJ4
Emma's taxable property value should be $600,000 since her taxes will be based on the assessment not the appraisal and also because she gets the $50,000 tax reduction so therefore to reiterate she will be taxed on only the $600,000.
Answer:
the answer for the first question is $166667.
the answer for the second question is $210526
the answer for the third question is An inverse.
Explanation:
given information that i will invest in a $10000 scholarship that will pay forever.
the interest rate charged is 6.00% per annum therefore this is a perpetuity present value problem where there is streams of income forever therefore we use the formula :
Pv of perpetuity= Cf/r
where Cr is the cash flows payed by the single investment forever in this case $10000 then r is the interest rate of the investment amount which is 6% in this case.
Pv of Perpetuity= $10000/6%
=$166667 therefore i must invest this amount to get the scholarship running with streams of $10000 forever.
in the second problem if now the interest rate is changed from 6% to 4.75% then the amount to be invested would be :
Pv of perpetuity = $10000/4.75%
=$210526 therefore this is the amount to be invested for a forever $10000 stream of incomes for a scholarship.
the relationship is indirect cause as the interest rate decreases the present value of the perpetuity that must be invested increases.
