1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shutvik [7]
3 years ago
9

Describe three important requirements you must meet in order to vote in the United States

History
2 answers:
Rudik [331]3 years ago
4 0
Must be 18 years old, a United States citizen, and the states residency.
kakasveta [241]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

You must be a American citizen

At least 35 years old

Resident of the us for at least 14 years

Explanation:

I took the quiz.

You might be interested in
*(15points!!)* write a short paragraph explaining if you would have been for or against U.S. expansion during this period 19th e
Arlecino [84]

Answer:

In my opinion, I would be for the U.S. expansion. With the expansion comes opportunities for new jobs, farming, new trading routes, and overall a chance at a new life. Although it is inaccurate to say that I would be in need of a job considering that I did not live at the same, I would assume that those in need of farm land and work would appreciate the movement. If I were a rich man living in the city during the time of expansion, I would still agree with the expansion. Because of the amount of people in search of a job in the city, the streets were crowded, work places were filled to the top, and people were desperate for work. The expansion allows for these people to move and find new work somewhere else that does not interfere with my work. However, we can not overlook the horrible things that came with this movement such as slavery, the deaths of many people, and the basic fact that it was unconstitutional. In perspective, this question could differ depending on the person. I would have been against the expansion if I were an Indian whose home was taken and whose family was being killed by the travelers.

Explanation:

i dont know if this is good i just wrote something do what you will with it

3 0
3 years ago
Napisz w którym roku i w jakim celu zawiązano konfederację targowicką? Jak zakończyła się wojna polsko-rosyjska?
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

Wojna polsko-rosyjska z 1792 r. (Także wojna II rozbioru [3], a także w polskich źródłach wojna w obronie konstytucji (polski: wojna w obronie Konstytucji 3 maja) [4]) toczyła się między polską - Wspólnota Litewska z jednej strony, a Konfederacja Targowica (konserwatywna szlachta Rzeczypospolitej przeciwna nowej konstytucji z 3 maja 1791 r.) I Imperium Rosyjskie pod wodzą Katarzyny Wielkiej z drugiej [3].

Wojna toczyła się w dwóch teatrach: północnej na Litwie i południowej na Ukrainie. W obu przypadkach wojska polskie wycofały się przed liczebnie lepszymi siłami rosyjskimi, choć zaoferowały znacznie większy opór na południu, dzięki skutecznemu kierownictwu polskich dowódców księcia Józefa Poniatowskiego i Tadeusza Kościuszki. Podczas trzymiesięcznej walki stoczono kilka bitew, ale żadna ze stron nie odniosła decydującego zwycięstwa. [5] Największym sukcesem polskich sił była porażka jednej z rosyjskich formacji w bitwie pod Zieleńcami 18 czerwca; po bitwie ustanowiono najwyższą polską nagrodę wojskową Virtuti Militari. Wojna zakończyła się, gdy polski król Stanisław August Poniatowski postanowił szukać rozwiązania dyplomatycznego, poprosił o zawieszenie broni z Rosjanami i wstąpił do Konfederacji Targowickiej, zgodnie z żądaniem Imperium Rosyjskiego [6].

5 0
3 years ago
Which is the closest antonym for the word riveting
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

boring.

repellent.

repulsive.Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which groups are in conflict over claims to Palestinian territory?
SCORPION-xisa [38]

Answer:

Arabs and Jews

Explanation:

Israel(Jewish population) and Palestine(Arabs) have a complex claim tot he same tract of land, They were split up by the British when imperialism was ending, but the split was complex, and many pockets and separated areas were there, unlike India and Pakistan. But one group (Israelis), had the clear advantage and took over the entire tract of land and kept the Palestinians hostage, they also isolated a set of land which has economic disparity to this day. But the Palestinians attacked first in order to take all of the land so some see it as fit, that the Israelis had them in the situation they are in right now.

7 0
3 years ago
The impact of the invasion of India by Alexander the great is that
abruzzese [7]
He inspired Indian leaders to try to unify India D. Gr
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one reason that immigrants came to America in the late 1800s?
    5·1 answer
  • Which of these describe a belief shared by both Quanah Parker and Chief Seattle? A) Native Americans should cooperate with and w
    10·2 answers
  • 28) "Powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are _______ to the state
    12·1 answer
  • Medellin is known for:
    8·1 answer
  • How did the defeat of the Spanish Armada make colonizing the New World easier?
    12·2 answers
  • What layer is the arrow pointing to!!!​
    15·2 answers
  • What was a result of early objections to the draft, the cost of the war, and the number of lives lost?
    6·2 answers
  • Study the image above. Which of the following would you place in the section labeled “H”
    9·1 answer
  • What did people say about the women contribution to American victory in WWII?
    6·1 answer
  • Kashrut and Genetically Modified food
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!