1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Harrizon [31]
3 years ago
9

Why was it difficult for American forces to defend themselves against Japanese fire

History
1 answer:
Ivanshal [37]3 years ago
8 0
I don't know what you're referring to, and don't think it was much different than defending against a number of well-armed, trained, and disciplined troops. If anything, the German Army in WWII was a really tough bunch. 

<span>Two things may show some differences, however, at least in the war in the Pacific. Japanese were far more willing to fight to the last man, rather than surrender, whereas most German units would stick the white flag up when it was clear that they had lost the engagement, and had no retreat. In "island hopping", the US also took on extremely fortified Japanese positions that were not destroyed with even massive bombing and naval fire</span>
You might be interested in
According to the preamble, what is the purpose of the declaration of independence? what are the three unalienable rights listed
hammer [34]
According to the preamble, the purpose of the declaration is to break up the bond between the King and the colonies because the King as a ruler and as a form of government has not been able to protect or has even purposefully breached the unalienable rights for his own good and against the people.

The three unalienable rights that are listed are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They are self-evident and unalienable meaning that nobody can or should try to take them away from you and you are born with those rights. This is based on the philosophy of John Locke.

According to Jefferson, the primary reason for the existence of a government is to protect these rights. If a government is not protecting these unalienable rights then it should be changed for a new one which is what they want to do to the British crown since it is not protecting them.

According to the declaration, the government derives power from the people who choose it. It is specifically stated that the power of the government comes from the consent of the people to be governed. If the people don't want a government they are allowed to change it.

It is appropriate for the people to abolish their government when the government becomes tyrannical and breaches these unalienable rights and stops protecting people who elected it. This is why he states grievances as to what the king did to hurt the people which is why he should be changed.
3 0
3 years ago
Help plz:))) I’ll mark u brainliest
natima [27]

Answer:

Explanation:

In 1844, James K. Polk of Tennessee was elected president on a platform of westward expansion. He faced off with the British over control of the Oregon Territory and oversaw a successful war with Mexico, 1846–1848. The Mexican War and settling the Oregon question meant that the United States now stretched from the Atlantic to the Pacific. Western expansion soon took a major leap forward with the California Gold Rush, as thousands from the eastern states, as well as from foreign nations, headed for the territories of California and Nevada, hoping to strike it rich.

Effects of the Antebellum Period

The technological advances and religious and social movements of the Antebellum Period had a profound effect on the course of American history, including westward expansion to the Pacific, a population shift from farms to industrial centers, sectional divisions that ended in civil war, the abolition of slavery and the growth of feminist and temperance movements.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the purpose of the civil service examinations of China?
aliya0001 [1]

Answer:

The purpose was to test who was the most intellegent candidates to be bureaucrats in the chinese government

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
True or False: President Johnson supported states' rights and southern secession during the American Civil War.
KiRa [710]

Answer:

False Johnson is the only southern seator not to resign his seat in the US senate once the southern states left the union

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Writing Prompt: 1st Quarter: Respond to the writing prompt below. You will be scored on your focus, organization, evidence and d
marysya [2.9K]

Answer and Explanation:

I believe that freedom of expression is one of the most important rights defended by the first amendment. This is because we human beings are rational animals and we need to expose our thoughts and emotions to a certain subject, mainly when that subject involves social well-being and criticizes it for controversial and disadvantageous government attitudes.

An example of how free speech is important can be seen in the "Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District" case when a school banned students from showing their views on how the US handled its wars and abused nations more sensitized.

8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is one characteristic of a command economy
    7·1 answer
  • How was Miguel Hidalgo influenced by Enlightenment?
    5·1 answer
  • How did the retreat of Dunkirk affect Britain’s ability to fight Hitler?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the historical context for articles of confederation?
    8·1 answer
  • What is a region? What is geography?
    8·1 answer
  • What are three reasons the French Revolution characterized as bloodshed violence
    8·1 answer
  • Donde queda la torre ifele ?
    7·1 answer
  • What does Ralph Nader's 2000 presidential election bid illustrate regarding the role of third parties?
    8·1 answer
  • Which conclusion does the chart support?
    13·2 answers
  • Why do some countries have absolute advantages over others when producing certain products?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!