I dont get the question..yes?
<u>Marbury VS Madison</u>
John Marshall, in his decision, is in charge of pacifying the issue. Marshall argues, in short, that, in the hierarchy of laws, the US Constitution rules and the courts, as well as the other departments, are bound by it. Thus any law contrary to the Constitution should be declared void.
Thus, Marshall incidentally (incidentally) decides the unconstitutionality of Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, to the extent that it contravenes the precepts of the American Constitution. The unconstitutionality of a law was declared without the analysis of the merit itself. Note that Marshall, in making such a decision not on the merits, does not, in theory, give a favorable understanding to either of the poles, so as not to generate for him political conflicts with both parties.
<u>
The Whiskey Rebellion</u>
It was a "tax protest" in the United States, beginning in 1791 and culminating in an insurrection in 1794. The rebellion took place primarily in Washington, Pennsylvania, in the Monongahela Valley during the presidency of George Washington under the command of the American revolutionary war veteran Major James McFarlane.
Unlike Plato, he did not theorize about idealized principels of government. Aristotle believed that the ideal form of gvm't balanced monarchy, aristocracy, and democracy in one system.
The answer would be, B. there was a more prosperous economy.
Hope it helps.
Answer:
<u><em>Treaties between individual sovereign American Indian nations and the U.S. were negotiated. They were negotiated to establish borders. But also prescribe conditions of behavior between the parties.</em></u>
