Answer:
These Juries were capable of coming to two such verdict because, a criminal jury's burden of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt" and a civil jury's burden of proof is "preponderance of the evidence."
A criminal's jury burden of proof being beyond a reasonable doubt means that the legal standard for deciding the outcome of a criminal charge, requires evidence that is sufficient to eliminate any doubts that a reasonable person might entertain about whether a claim is more likely to be true than not.
A civil jury burden of proof being preponderance of the evidence means that the legal standard applied for deciding the outcome of civil disputes, requires that evidence be sufficient to determine that a claim is more likely to be true than not.
Answer:The Intolerable Acts were a series of laws passed by the British Parliament in the mid-1770s. The British instated the acts to make an example of the colonies after the Boston Tea Party, and the outrage they caused became the major push that led to the outbreak American Revolution in 1775.
Explanation:
The Tea Act, passed by Parliament on May 10, 1773, granted the British East India Company Tea a monopoly on tea sales in the American colonies. ... The policy ignited a “powder keg” of opposition and resentment among American colonists and was the catalyst of the Boston Tea Party.
Answer:
All of them are senior members
Explanation:
Bheja is a senior member and so is Badghar and Guthi
Answer:
True
Explanation:
It is true that shaping is often used in operant conditioning in order to learn complex behaviours. Shaping occurs when, instead of only rewarding the target behaviour, approximations of the behaviour are also rewarded. This is due to the expectation that over time, these behaviours would grow closer to the desired response. Therefore, the behaviour is considered to be gradually changed, or "shaped."
