Answer:
First, the activity that humans execute that affects their ecosystem positively is reforestation. Second, the activity that humans execute that affects their ecosystem positively is hunting. Their effects rely completely in nature, however, one improves the ecosystem by making it greener and increasing the space nature has to grow, while the other impacts the ecosystem negatively by unbalancing the food chain.
Explanation:
The reasons behind this answer are that in the first place the ecosystem is a very sensitive environment that can be affected by a wide range of factors. In the first place, reforestation helps the environment have better conditions for the animals that live in it, as well as to provide the human race a better quality of air, water and feel better after living in a more natural ecosystem. While hunting breaks the ecosystem's balance because it allows the food chain of the ecosystem to break and allow a general modification.
Answer: Disagree
Explanation:
I tend to disagree with this statement because predators actually have a place in ecosystems to keep prey species from becoming overpopulated, hence, the extent of the overpopulation would likely have been much less if the natural predators were allowed to play a role in controlling the deer population.
Answer:
Explanation:
We recognize that total occurrence equals new cases of disease over time divided by the number of people at risk at the onset.
Mathematically:
Given that:
Number of the population at risk = 1000 individuals
New cases during Jan 1 - Dec 31 = 60 because;
At 20 occurred on June 30 & 40 on Sept. 30) & no new cases were identified after that:
∴
It’s like 50/50 but we know that it is going to be Dominant "Tall" should be your answer
