The state legislature could have refused to implement the decision, leading to a crisis in the legitimacy of the Supreme Court's authority.
Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Preferred court docket case that held that federal courts should hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral obstacles, i.E. Redistricting, violates the identical safety Clause of the Fourteenth modification of the charter.
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), became a landmark USA ideal court docket case in which the court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question beneath the Fourteenth Amendment, therefore enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth amendment-based totally redistricting instances.
Learn more about legislature here brainly.com/question/809346
#SPJ4
Answer:
Correct answer is "c".
Explanation:
We always use the “marginal analysis”( marginal costs and marginal benefits) when we have to choose what to do in our lives. The costs and benefits can be visible or invisible.
But only the person inside the situation can do the calculation. It doesn't have a correct answer, these are cases where the cost and the benefit are abstract.
Answer:
matching hypothesis
Explanation:
Matching hypothesis -
It is the theory , where the people with similar quality , behaviour or thinking tries to be together , in term of the social desirability , is known as matching hypothesis .
According to this theory , people tries to select their partner considering their taste to be as similar as possible , so they both can have same or similar thinking for life .
From this theory , people evaluate their own value and make some realistic choices by characterizing the best potential partner , to establish the similar level of attraction and comfort .
Answer:
4) abstract; concrete
Explanation:
Alene is able to easily understant abstract concepts and ideas, which is why she comments the reasoning about the conclusion of the apple A being bigger than apple C. Aline shows an abstract thought, while Janis shows a concrete thought as evidenced in her only being able to "get it" after Alene explained again, using the physical apples. She needed to see a physical object in order to understand the idea.
Answer: Nativists argued that immigrants would not fit into American culture because their languages, religions, and customs were too different. Many workers resented the new immigrants because they took jobs for low pay. Others feared them because they were different.
