Why did stalin join the allied forces in ww2?

1 answer:

8 0

The first years of the war the Soviet Union (Stalin) and Nazi Germany (Hitler) had a "no-attacking" agreement and in a joint attack (from the east and the west) ravaged Poland.
After that Hitler (despite the ongoing battles/fronts in the west) attacks the Soviet Union.
At this point there are two big fronts of war and one smaller. Now the allied forces have taken Afrika and want to advance on Italy and France but they need someone to put pressure on the eastern front. Stalin on the other hand wants to liberate all of the soviet lands and form one big Russia. (later known as USSR/CCCP) The leaders of 3 great forces meet and devise a plan to attack at the same time from all sides so they can split the remaining nazi forces. And they do so.

Hope you enjoyed this short history lesson. ;)

You might be interested in

Please help me quickly

Hatshy [7]

A communist, fascist, totalitarian dictatorship government is :

A government that practices the doctrine of public ownership, forcefully suppress opposition and critics while totally controlling all commerce and industry in the region or country.

<h3>Describing A communist, fascist, totalitarian dictatorship government</h3>

A government that does not allow the expression of basic human rights such as the right to association, right to freedom and right to life while discouraging private ownership of business for profit, is a communist, fascists, totalitarian government.

This kind of government is headed by a ruthless dictator and certain countries fall within this kind of government.

Hence we can conclude that A communist, fascist, totalitarian dictatorship government is a government that practices the doctrine of public ownership, forcefully suppress opposition and critics while totally controlling all commerce and industry in the region or country.

Learn more about fascist government : brainly.com/question/2429083

#SPJ1

3 0

2 years ago

Which statement is true about the U.S. Constitution?

Komok [63]

Answer:

we have to gave the statements to help you :(((

4 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

A criticism of the American system of federalism is that it is: A) unresponsive when it is faced with a dangerous emergency situ

Tanzania [10]

A major criticism of the American system of federalism is that it is "<span>C) inefficient in responding to crises involving multiple levels of government". Many say that there are "too many cooks in the kitchen" in this sense. </span>

6 0

3 years ago

Anong uri ng panitikan ang tanka

tangare [24]

I don’t understand this language,but I need points really badly.Sorry.

7 0

3 years ago

HELP PLZ URGENTTTTTTT PLZZZZZ

ira [324]

Answer: The relationships with other nations during the regime of the Safavid rule.

Explanation: There weren't any designated foreign affairs institution. This part of the management was in the hands of the Shah (emperor) and vizier (minister of the emperor's court).

They used envoys to reach out to other nations for trade and commerce and other help in times of need such as war and other calamity. A representative who was sent was given standing instructions for the purpose he was sent to other nations.

The nature of letter and requests to be sent would be recorded in relevant documents. it also stated the time of writing and arrival of the document in the hands of the leader of the other nations. this was the nature of correspondence and negotiations would follow thus.

Later on permanent embassies with envoys were established and they had foreign relations with countries such as Great Britain, Russia, Ottoman Turkey.

6 0

4 years ago